Hi James, Jonathan,Lorenz,Salil,all
I got request from Salil that he wants to have a sync up meeting about the vCPU Hotplug in next week, since Salil & James will present the latest vCPU Hotplug kernel/Qemu status in the KVM Forum 2023 conference(June 14th to 15th)
Are you all available next week(default is next Tue, but I can change the time according to your time.)
Thanks:) Joyce
在 2023年5月24日,下午4:18,linaro-open-discussions-request@op-lists.linaro.org 写道:
Send Linaro-open-discussions mailing list submissions to linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to linaro-open-discussions-request@op-lists.linaro.org
You can reach the person managing the list at linaro-open-discussions-owner@op-lists.linaro.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Linaro-open-discussions digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: 回复:Re: 回复:Li =?utf-8?Q?naro-open-discussions_call_on_May___24th (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 10:18:00 +0200 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org Subject: [Linaro-open-discussions] Re: 回复:Re: 回复:Li =?utf-8?Q?naro-open-discussions_call_on_May___24th To: Kefeng Wang wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Cc: Yicong Yang yangyicong@huawei.com, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org, yangyicong@hisilicon.com, James Morse james.morse@arm.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@gmail.com, "linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org" linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org, Tong Tiangen tongtiangen@huawei.com Message-ID: CAONfiQqWeXS6ZNh-ZgTR+h=hC6uZtjnMnhUx78oNvfby2FiisA@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 11:00, Kefeng Wang wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com wrote:
On 2023/5/22 16:37, Yicong Yang wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
On 2023/5/22 16:14, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 10:07, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Yicong,
Thanks for bring up these topics, yeah, our Open Discussion meeting is on May 23th.
Hi James, Mike,
Can you help involve Arm maintainers like Catalin,Mark,Will and the relative people in if you have?
Is there anything controversial in those series or they are just following the normal review cycle on the mailing lists ? I don't think arm64 maintainers would be willing to join the discussions unless we are stuck on some specific issues that can't be resolved on mailing lists.
Please let me know, thanks.
For the batch TLB flush topic, it is previously discussed how to enable this by a runtime tunnable to avoid potential impact on small systems with several cores. Catalin proposal one method and I want to see if there's any other worries. But for this I think it can be resolved on the mailing list.
For the RAS topic,
Hi Kefeng, more input?
For the RAS patch, the biggest issue is that there is very few feedback from the maintainers :(
I need some time to ask people to chime in, we can't expect this to be organized with such a short notice.
- ARM64 MC-Safe Copy,
Mark Rutland give some advises in v4 and all are adressed, Catain give us some comments in v8 and all are fixed too in v9. This feature is pushed out one years ago( in 2022/4/16), so we want to make sure that could it be picked up for v6.4?
v6.5 you mean. We can try to use these discussions to facilitate the upstreaming but again, this requires some time to prepare.
2)Handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Both huawei and alibaba are trying to fix the commit 7f17b4a121d0 ("ACPI: APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors") which is from James Morse(glad to see James is Cced), but for now no respone from apei/arm.
We want the two arm64 RAS enhancements to be accpeted, any comments and feedbacks from maintainer are appreciated
Understood. See above.
Thanks, Lorenzo
Thanks.
Lorenzo
Thanks:) Joyce
在 2023年5月22日,下午3:58,Yicong Yang yangyicong@huawei.com 写道:
Hi Joyce, Jonathan,
Do we plan an open-discussion for this month? If there is, we'd like to discuss 3 memory related topics which will benefit our platform:
- the batched TLB flush support on arm64 to optimize the performance of unmapping and page migration on arm64
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230518065934.12877-1-yangyicong@huawei.co... 2) ARM64 RAS enhancement including below content. This is important for our product since we've met some real issues. a) ARM64 support Machine Check safe memory copy(ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC) https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221219120008.3818828-1-tongtiangen@huawei.com... b) Handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230408091359.31554-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.c... https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221205160043.57465-1-xiexiuqi@huawei.com/
We'd like to discuss the current status of these works, the solution and to see if there's any suggestions and worries.
The topics involve memory and RAS related aspect so please feel free to drag anybody works in this area. We'd like to discuss this with related arm maintianers like Catalin, Mark, Will or others if possible.
Thanks, Yicong
On 2022/7/25 21:17, Joyce Qi wrote: > Hi Shamee,Lorenz, > > Thanks for the feedback,maybe we can postpone tomorrow’s LOD meeting?and welcome to bring up the topic we can arrange it accordingly. > > Thanks:) > Joyce > > >> 在 2022年7月25日,下午6:04,Shameerali Kolothum Thodi shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com 写道: >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Lorenzo Pieralisi [mailto:lorenzo.pieralisi@gmail.com] >>> Sent: 25 July 2022 10:46 >>> To: Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org >>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron jonathan.cameron@huawei.com; Shameerali >>> Kolothum Thodi shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com; Jonathon >>> Burcham jon.burcham@linaro.org; yangyicong >>> yangyicong@huawei.com; Hesham Almatary >>> hesham.almatary@huawei.com; shenyang (M) >>> shenyang39@huawei.com; tangchengchang >>> tangchengchang@huawei.com; Dietmar Eggemann >>> Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com; linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org; >>> Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org >>> Subject: Re: [Linaro-open-discussions] 回复:Re: 回复:Li >>> =?utf-8?Q?naro-open-discussions_call_on_May___24th >>> >>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 at 16:28, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Jonatha,Lorenz,Shamee, >>>> >>>> Do you have any topics want to sync on July 26’s LOD meeting? >>> >>> [dropped my arm.com address and added @linaro.org one] >>> >>> I am just catching up after a 2 month hiatus but if there is anything urgent to >>> be discussed I am happy to join the call and run the meeting. >> >> >> Met too just back after holidays and don't have anything urgent for discussion >> from my end. Also, Jonathan is away this week. >> >> Thanks, >> Shameer >> >>> Lorenzo >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks:) >>>> Joyce >>>> >>>> >>>>> 在 2022年6月24日,下午10:38,Jonathan Cameron >>> jonathan.cameron@huawei.com >>>>> 写道: >>>>> >>>>> My availability that week is going to be hard to predict (at a workshop in >>> Germany) but SPDM topic can wait. >>>>> I just wanted to confirm general interest and email works fine for that. >>>>> >>>>> Good for others to have a sync meeting and if I can dial in for a bit I will >>> do so. >>>>> >>>>> Jonathan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Lorenzo Pieralisi Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com >>>>> Sent: 24 June 2022 15:30 >>>>> To: Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org >>>>> Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi >>>>> shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com; Jonathan Cameron >>>>> jonathan.cameron@huawei.com; Lorenzo Pieralisi >>>>> lpieralisi@kernel.org; Jonathon Burcham jon.burcham@linaro.org; >>>>> yangyicong yangyicong@huawei.com; Hesham Almatary >>>>> hesham.almatary@huawei.com; shenyang (M) >>> shenyang39@huawei.com; >>>>> tangchengchang tangchengchang@huawei.com; Dietmar Eggemann >>>>> Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com; >>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org; >>>>> lorenzo.pieralisi@gmail.com >>>>> Subject: Re: [Linaro-open-discussions] 回复:Re: 回复:Li >>>>> =?utf-8?Q?naro-open-discussions_call_on_May___24th >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Moving to July 5th is fine by me. >>>>> >>>>> For IORT RMR I'd encourage Shameer to ping the mailing list for SMMU >>> ACKs and not wait till July 5th, I believe I acked the relevant patches. >>>>> >>>>> I CC'ed my personal email since the email address I am sending from will >>> stop working tonight. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Lorenzo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>> From: Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org >>>>> Sent: 24 June 2022 15:25 >>>>> To: Lorenzo Pieralisi >>>>> Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi; Jonathan Cameron; Lorenzo Pieralisi; >>>>> Jonathon Burcham; yangyicong; Hesham Almatary; shenyang (M); >>>>> tangchengchang; Dietmar Eggemann; >>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>> Subject: Re: [Linaro-open-discussions] 回复:Re: 回复:Li >>>>> =?utf-8?Q?naro-open-discussions_call_on_May___24th >>>>> >>>>> Hi Lorenzo,Jonathan,Shameerali, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for all your feedback,So can we move the LOD to July 5th for >>>>> the SPDM discussions? >>>>> If that’s ok,I can reschedule the LDO meeting. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks:) >>>>> Joyce >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 在 2022年6月24日,下午8:51,Lorenzo Pieralisi >>> Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com >>>>>> 写道: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am traveling, I am interested on the SPDM discussions, I did not >>>>>> think there is much left to do wrt IORT RMR (other than merging it >>>>>> and decide who does that) but we can talk on thursday, just use >>>>>> lorenzo.pieralisi@gmail.com please to send the invite. >>>>>> >>>>>> If we can talk week starting July 4th honestly it would even be >>>>>> better. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Lorenzo >>>>>> >>>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>>> From: joyce.qi--- via Linaro-open-discussions >>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>>> Sent: 24 June 2022 11:33 >>>>>> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi; Jonathan Cameron; Lorenzo Pieralisi >>>>>> Cc: Jonathon Burcham; yangyicong; Hesham Almatary; shenyang (M); >>>>>> tangchengchang; Dietmar Eggemann; >>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>>> Subject: [Linaro-open-discussions] 回复:Re: 回复:Li >>>>>> =?utf-8?Q?naro-open-discussions_call_on_May___24th >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Jonanthan,Shameerali, >>>>>> Thanks a lot for your input here:) >>>>>> @Lorenzo, >>>>>> Are you available on next Thuesday’s LOD meeting for checking the >>>>>> status on IORT RMR series Shameerali has brought up? >>>>>> Thanks:) >>>>>> Joyce >>>>>> >>>>>> -------- 原始邮件 -------- >>>>>> 发件人: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi >>>>>> shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com >>>>>> 日期: 2022年6月24日周五 傍晚5:24 >>>>>> 收件人: Jonathan Cameron jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, >>>>>> joyce.qi@linaro.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi lpieralisi@kernel.org >>>>>> 抄送: Jonathon Burcham jon.burcham@linaro.org, yangyicong >>>>>> yangyicong@huawei.com, Hesham Almatary >>>>>> hesham.almatary@huawei.com, "shenyang (M)" >>>>>> shenyang39@huawei.com, tangchengchang >>>>>> tangchengchang@huawei.com, Dietmar Eggemann >>>>>> dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, >>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>>> 主 题: RE: [Linaro-open-discussions] Re: 回复:Li >>>>>> =?utf-8?Q?naro-open-discussions_call_on_May___24th >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Jonathan Cameron via Linaro-open-discussions >>>>>>> [mailto:linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org] >>>>>>> Sent: 24 June 2022 10:13 >>>>>>> To: joyce.qi@linaro.org >>>>>>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron via Linaro-open-discussions >>>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org; Jonathon Burcham >>>>>>> jon.burcham@linaro.org; yangyicong yangyicong@huawei.com; >>>>>>> Hesham Almatary hesham.almatary@huawei.com; shenyang (M) >>>>>>> shenyang39@huawei.com; tangchengchang >>>>>>> tangchengchang@huawei.com; Dietmar Eggemann >>>>>>> dietmar.eggemann@arm.com >>>>>>> Subject: [Linaro-open-discussions] Re: 回复:Linaro-open-discussions >>>>>> call on >>>>>>> May 24th >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Joyce, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the reminder. I don’t think it is worth discussing at >>>>>> LOD as not >>>>>>> the right people on the call, but I would like to draw attention >>>>>>> to a >>>>>> thread >>>>>>> discussing whether to propose a SPDM BoF at Linux Plumbers: >>>>>>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20220609124702.000037b0@Huawei.c >>>>>>> om/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At the moment I plan to speculatively put in a proposal, but may >>>>>> withdraw it >>>>>>> if not enough people would be involved to make useful progress. >>>>>>> The big ‘discussion’ point is how much to do in kernel vs in >>>>>> Userspace. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I’ve just polled some of my colleagues for any other topics they >>>>>> would like to >>>>>>> raise on LOD, but for now I don’t have anything ready to talk about. >>>>>> If Lorenzo is around, would like to check the status on IORT RMR >>>>>> series. >>>>>> I have sent out the v13 here, >>>>>> >>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20220615101044.1972-8-shameerali >>>>>> .kol >>>>>> othum.thodi@huawei.com/T/ >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Shameer >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: joyce.qi@linaro.org joyce.qi@linaro.org >>>>>>> Sent: 24 June 2022 10:06 >>>>>>> To: Jonathan Cameron jonathan.cameron@huawei.com >>>>>>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron via Linaro-open-discussions >>>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org; Lorenzo Pieralisi >>>>>>> lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; Jonathon Burcham >>>>>> jon.burcham@linaro.org; >>>>>>> yangyicong yangyicong@huawei.com; Hesham Almatary >>>>>>> hesham.almatary@huawei.com; shenyang (M) >>>>>>> shenyang39@huawei.com; tangchengchang >>>>>>> tangchengchang@huawei.com; Dietmar Eggemann >>>>>>> dietmar.eggemann@arm.com >>>>>>> Subject: 回复:[Linaro-open-discussions] Linaro-open-discussions call >>>>>>> on May 24th >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jonanthan,all >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you have anything to sync during next week's LOD meeting? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> Joyce >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------- 原始邮件 -------- >>>>>>> 发件人: Joyce Qi <joyce.qi@linaro.orgmailto:joyce.qi@linaro.org> >>>>>>> 日期: 2022年5月24日周二 早上7:08 >>>>>>> 收件人: Jonathan Cameron >>>>>>> >>> <jonathan.cameron@huawei.commailto:jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> >>>>>>> 抄送: Jonathan Cameron via Linaro-open-discussions >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-open-dis >>>>> cuss >>>>>> ions >>>>>>> @op-lists.linaro.org>>, Lorenzo Pieralisi >>>>>>> <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.commailto:lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, >>>>>> Jonathon >>>>>>> Burcham <jon.burcham@linaro.orgmailto:jon.burcham@linaro.org>, >>>>>>> yangyicong >>> <yangyicong@huawei.commailto:yangyicong@huawei.com>, >>>>>>> Hesham Almatary >>>>>>> >>> <hesham.almatary@huawei.commailto:hesham.almatary@huawei.com>, >>>>>>> "shenyang (M)" >>>>>>> <shenyang39@huawei.commailto:shenyang39@huawei.com>, >>>>>>> tangchengchang >>>>>>> >>> <tangchengchang@huawei.commailto:tangchengchang@huawei.com>, >>>>>>> Dietmar Eggemann >>>>>>> <dietmar.eggemann@arm.commailto:dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> >>>>>>> 主 题: Re: [Linaro-open-discussions] Linaro-open-discussions call on >>>>>> May >>>>>>> 24th >>>>>>> Hi Jonathan,all >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the confirm. >>>>>>> I will cancel today’s meeting since no topic:) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks:) >>>>>>> Joyce >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 在 2022年5月20日,下午7:10,Jonathan Cameron >>>>>>> >>> <jonathan.cameron@huawei.commailto:jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> >>>>>>> 写道: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Joyce, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nothing to discuss from me. Anyone else have anything they want >>>>>>> to >>>>>> bring >>>>>>> up? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Joyce Qi <joyce.qi@linaro.orgmailto:joyce.qi@linaro.org> >>>>>>> Sent: 18 May 2022 10:37 >>>>>>> To: Jonathan Cameron >>>>>>> >>> <jonathan.cameron@huawei.commailto:jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> >>>>>>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron via Linaro-open-discussions >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-open-dis >>>>> cuss >>>>>> ions >>>>>>> @op-lists.linaro.org>>; Lorenzo Pieralisi >>>>>>> <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.commailto:lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>; >>>>>> Jonathon >>>>>>> Burcham <jon.burcham@linaro.orgmailto:jon.burcham@linaro.org>; >>>>>>> yangyicong >>> <yangyicong@huawei.commailto:yangyicong@huawei.com>; >>>>>>> Hesham Almatary >>>>>>> >>> <hesham.almatary@huawei.commailto:hesham.almatary@huawei.com>; >>>>>>> shenyang (M) >>>>>>> <shenyang39@huawei.commailto:shenyang39@huawei.com>; >>>>>>> tangchengchang >>>>>>> >>> <tangchengchang@huawei.commailto:tangchengchang@huawei.com>; >>>>>>> Dietmar Eggemann >>>>>>> <dietmar.eggemann@arm.commailto:dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Linaro-open-discussions] Linaro-open-discussions >>>>>>> call >>>>>> on May >>>>>>> 24th >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jonathan, Lorenz ,all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you have any topic to discuss during the Linaro open >>>>>>> discussions >>>>>> next >>>>>>> Tuesday? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks:) >>>>>>> Joyce >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 在 2022年4月26日,上午1:45,Jonathan Cameron >>>>>>> >>> <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.commailto:Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com >>>> >>>>>>> 写道: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:00:06 +0100 Jonathan Cameron via >>>>>>> Linaro-open-discussions >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-open-dis >>>>> cuss >>>>>> ions >>>>>>> @op-lists.linaro.org>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:33:29 +0100 Lorenzo Pieralisi >>>>>>> <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.commailto:lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:36:43AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 21:32:01 +0800 Joyce Qi via >>>>>>> Linaro-open-discussions >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-open-dis >>>>> cuss >>>>>> ions >>>>>>> @op-lists.linaro.org>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jonathon锟斤拷Lorenzo锟斤拷 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do we have some topic to discuss for the Linaro-open-disscussions >>>>>> next >>>>>>> week? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks:) >>>>>>> Joyce >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Joyce, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the reminder. So topics: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> RMR: Nothing from our side >>>>>>> >>>>>>> vCPUHP: we have a 'working' QEMU tree though it has some known >>>>>>> problems (doesn't work with SVE for some reason - so some >>>>>>> debugging >>>>>> to >>>>>>> do). Should be able to upload that shortly for anyone else who >>>>>>> wants to play with it. Any updates on progress of kernel patches >>>>>>> from ARM side would be good but email is fine for that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could not work on them, I need to figure out a plan and quickly, >>>>>>> we can talk about that though, I should be able to have a clearer >>>>>>> picture by Tuesday. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am still using your SPDM stack and there are a couple of things >>>>>>> I don't get (eg CHALLENGE_AUTH signature verification, RSA path, >>>>>>> spdm_asym_rsassa_3072 path in spdm_verify_signature() - just >>>>>>> wanted to ask if you tested this path, I am struggling with >>>>>>> signature verification - just wanted to ask in particular about >>>>>>> the need for >>>>>>> ASN.1 encoding to use verify_signature()). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tested this again and it seems to be working (tm) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here are the logs... Just in case you fancy hand decoding the >>>>>> exchange. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sig should be the very last bit of the last message (ignoring the >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> pad IIRC) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Platform Port Transmit Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Transmit >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Transmit Size: 00 00 00 >>>>>>> 0c Platform Port Transmit Buffer: 01 00 01 00 03 00 00 00 10 84 00 >>>>>>> 00 Platform Port Receive Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port >>>>>>> Receive >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Receive Size: 00 00 00 14 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Buffer: 01 00 01 00 05 00 00 00 10 04 00 00 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 03 00 >>>>>>> 10 00 11 00 12 >>>>>>> Platform Port Transmit Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Transmit >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Transmit Size: 00 00 00 >>>>>>> 0c Platform Port Transmit Buffer: 01 00 01 00 03 00 00 00 10 84 00 >>>>>>> 00 Platform Port Receive Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port >>>>>>> Receive >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Receive Size: 00 00 00 14 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Buffer: 01 00 01 00 05 00 00 00 10 04 00 00 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 03 00 >>>>>>> 10 00 11 00 12 >>>>>>> Platform Port Transmit Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Transmit >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Transmit Size: 00 00 00 >>>>>>> 14 Platform Port Transmit Buffer: 01 00 01 00 05 00 00 00 11 e1 >>>>>>> 00 00 >>>>>> 00 02 >>>>>>> 00 00 c6 f7 00 00 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Receive >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Receive Size: 00 00 00 14 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Buffer: 01 00 01 00 05 00 00 00 11 61 00 00 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 00 00 >>>>>>> 00 f7 fb 00 00 >>>>>>> Platform Port Transmit Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Transmit >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Transmit Size: 00 00 00 >>>>>>> 38 Platform Port Transmit Buffer: 01 00 01 00 0e 00 00 00 11 e3 >>>>>>> 04 00 >>>>>> 30 00 >>>>>>> 01 00 94 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 00 >>>>>>> 00 00 02 20 1b 00 03 20 06 00 04 20 94 00 05 20 01 00 Platform >>>>>>> Port Receive Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Receive >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 >>>>>>> 00 00 02 Platform Port Receive Size: 00 00 00 3c Platform Port >>>>>>> Receive Buffer: 01 00 01 00 0f 00 00 00 11 63 04 00 34 >>>>>> 00 >>>>>>> 01 00 08 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 00 >>>>>>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 20 10 00 03 20 02 00 04 20 04 00 05 20 01 00 >>>>>>> Platform Port Transmit Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Transmit >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Transmit Size: 00 00 00 >>>>>>> 0c Platform Port Transmit Buffer: 01 00 01 00 03 00 00 00 11 81 00 >>>>>>> 00 Platform Port Receive Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port >>>>>>> Receive >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Receive Size: 00 00 00 9c >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Buffer: 01 00 01 00 27 00 00 00 11 01 00 07 >>>>>>> 6b >>>>>> 3e 6a >>>>>>> 85 12 30 ed ec 1e 27 0e 6e 96 b0 95 68 eb b0 1f 9a 7a 63 f6 bd 04 >>>>>>> 0d >>>>>> 04 cc >>>>>>> 45 0a 03 b9 aa d6 e7 1b 7e 85 04 ae 18 55 8d 47 58 c4 cd 59 6b 3e >>>>>>> 6a >>>>>> 85 12 >>>>>>> 30 ed ec 1e 27 0e 6e 96 b0 95 68 eb b0 1f 9a 7a 63 f6 bd 04 0d 04 >>>>>>> cc >>>>>> 45 0a >>>>>>> 03 b9 aa d6 e7 1b 7e 85 04 ae 18 55 8d 47 58 c4 cd 59 6b 3e 6a 85 >>>>>>> 12 >>>>>> 30 ed >>>>>>> ec 1e 27 0e 6e 96 b0 95 68 eb b0 1f 9a 7a 63 f6 bd 04 0d 04 cc 45 >>>>>>> 0a >>>>>> 03 b9 >>>>>>> aa d6 e7 1b 7e 85 04 ae 18 55 8d 47 58 c4 cd 59 Platform Port >>>>>>> Transmit Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Transmit TransportType: >>>>>>> 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Transmit Size: 00 00 00 10 Platform Port >>>>>>> Transmit Buffer: 01 00 01 00 04 00 00 00 11 82 00 00 00 >>>>>> 00 00 >>>>>>> 80 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Receive >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Receive Size: 00 00 04 10 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Buffer: 01 00 01 00 04 01 00 00 11 02 00 00 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 04 64 >>>>>>> 0a 64 0e 00 00 99 e0 d4 22 35 22 e5 ba 58 24 e7 1e eb cf 9a 2c b5 >>>>>>> b5 >>>>>> 71 10 >>>>>>> ce aa 50 f5 64 83 78 d8 2d 9e 3b 99 53 74 db 98 d0 6f 63 cd 84 35 >>>>>>> c5 >>>>>> 10 cc >>>>>>> 21 f3 e0 30 82 05 19 30 82 03 01 a0 03 02 01 02 02 14 22 4d 06 18 >>>>>>> d5 >>>>>> d4 >>>>>>> a8 45 bf 5d f5 56 06 47 3f 90 a9 20 21 27 30 0d 06 09 2a 86 48 86 >>>>>>> f7 >>>>>> 0d 01 >>>>>>> 01 0c 05 00 30 1c 31 1a 30 18 06 03 55 04 03 0c 11 69 6e 74 65 6c >>>>>>> 20 >>>>>> 74 65 >>>>>>> 73 74 20 52 53 41 20 43 41 30 1e 17 0d 32 32 30 33 30 33 31 31 33 >>>>>>> 38 >>>>>> 34 >>>>>>> 32 5a 17 0d 33 32 30 32 32 39 31 31 33 38 34 32 5a 30 1c 31 1a 30 >>>>>>> 18 >>>>>> 06 >>>>>>> 03 55 04 03 0c 11 69 6e 74 65 6c 20 74 65 73 74 20 52 53 41 20 43 >>>>>>> 41 >>>>>> 30 >>>>>>> 82 02 22 30 0d 06 09 2a 86 48 86 f7 0d 01 01 01 05 00 03 82 02 0f >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 30 82 >>>>>>> 02 0a 02 82 02 01 00 b6 80 53 6e c7 66 9e 23 0f e9 2a d4 68 59 54 >>>>>>> ec >>>>>> bc cd >>>>>>> dd 1d 37 52 f9 fb 48 ed 9b 8e e5 20 77 a0 57 26 ba a4 e4 44 95 9c >>>>>>> 13 >>>>>> 30 36 >>>>>>> b8 03 39 33 58 4f 0f 19 5f 28 21 ee 52 f4 b0 4c 7b c1 86 94 ed 12 >>>>>>> cf >>>>>> 1b 24 >>>>>>> d2 20 d8 6a 7b 33 86 3e 84 b8 0e 57 06 14 fb ff a5 a7 05 ca 75 0c >>>>>>> b2 >>>>>> f0 d7 >>>>>>> 58 d0 b5 92 de ff a5 82 54 90 35 60 f3 c8 8f 2f 16 5f 89 91 5b 42 >>>>>>> 14 >>>>>> 04 23 >>>>>>> 44 04 54 2f 36 ab f7 29 91 9e 45 46 09 fc d9 45 29 a8 08 83 68 18 >>>>>>> 58 >>>>>> d3 7b >>>>>>> 9a b4 0e 3a b7 08 19 6f c2 7c 14 0f a3 3e fa ad 99 71 35 a5 fc ef >>>>>>> c1 >>>>>> 31 93 ae >>>>>>> db a7 5c 67 e1 e7 ef 53 8b ab 3e 48 6d d1 78 86 84 41 43 97 4d af >>>>>>> d4 >>>>>> 55 42 >>>>>>> 4b 3c 8a 5e c9 bb 10 8a 6e 62 2d bc d6 29 de cf ae 2b f8 66 e0 a8 >>>>>>> 0e >>>>>> 9a 86 >>>>>>> e5 dd fc 85 ae 9c a9 28 a0 7d e8 93 7f cf 1b e2 7a d0 d4 c0 3c 92 >>>>>>> 88 >>>>>> 06 ba >>>>>>> 3a d3 18 3c a1 98 f2 95 3a b5 0c 98 57 97 06 22 91 a7 86 c9 87 a3 >>>>>>> b1 >>>>>> da 71 >>>>>>> d6 14 79 a1 94 5b da fc d5 2e b3 4a 4f c2 8b 4a 99 44 4c da 3b 43 >>>>>>> 1c >>>>>> 35 4d >>>>>>> e1 a7 18 b9 d8 be fb 49 5f a7 51 20 08 e7 43 2b 81 ae da 7f 67 82 >>>>>>> 50 >>>>>> a7 4d >>>>>>> 4a d2 65 04 57 5a 4a 74 66 da f3 58 9a cd 12 49 8e af 3b d8 ee 5c >>>>>>> 56 >>>>>> 72 37 >>>>>>> 2d 8d ca 57 10 d4 b5 cc 35 95 18 76 aa 20 dc 5f 45 b8 19 98 9f b7 >>>>>>> 94 >>>>>> 8f 05 >>>>>>> 9e 3e f8 ee 51 7d 23 47 20 29 07 fa d4 d6 c2 28 4a 79 6a b3 3b ec >>>>>>> c3 >>>>>> 64 ee >>>>>>> 78 4c d2 72 95 74 5b 8c 90 25 d4 11 68 89 fe bc 8e e4 a3 fa d6 b4 >>>>>>> 6c >>>>>> 46 63 >>>>>>> 31 99 25 06 5a 30 85 4a 0e 22 38 b7 33 07 65 11 1b 12 88 0b 71 37 >>>>>>> 20 >>>>>> 2b >>>>>>> 54 00 43 30 24 e9 22 98 1b 6d 6c da 98 02 8d 36 6b 08 1f 03 90 e4 >>>>>>> bb >>>>>> dc 0b >>>>>>> c4 3d b0 00 93 ab d9 11 6f da 04 32 48 3c 61 d0 d6 7b 5d 72 f8 3c >>>>>>> 85 >>>>>> 65 9f >>>>>>> b6 c0 5f 0d a7 1e d6 ad d8 0a a1 70 1f b8 3a f8 8b 4b 99 02 03 01 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 01 a3 >>>>>>> 53 30 51 30 1d 06 03 55 1d 0e 04 16 04 14 b3 c1 9a d7 32 bf 99 6b >>>>>>> 9f >>>>>> 77 8a >>>>>>> 11 f4 fc 24 92 43 f7 f7 ec 30 1f 06 03 55 1d 23 04 18 30 16 80 14 >>>>>>> b3 >>>>>> c1 9a >>>>>>> d7 32 bf 99 6b 9f 77 8a 11 f4 fc 24 92 43 f7 f7 ec 30 0f 06 03 55 >>>>>>> 1d >>>>>> 13 01 01 >>>>>>> ff 04 05 30 03 01 01 ff 30 0d 06 09 2a 86 48 86 f7 0d 01 01 0c 05 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 03 82 >>>>>>> 02 01 00 72 e2 8c aa 49 24 3f e9 53 a6 15 6d a0 da ed b8 ac d7 9b >>>>>>> fd >>>>>> 9b 19 >>>>>>> e3 e1 b4 27 36 79 24 63 03 0b f5 55 6c 22 cc 81 a7 1f 8c 90 d1 3e >>>>>>> f8 >>>>>> cd f1 >>>>>>> 79 8a ae 1f 4c aa 2b 6a 1b a5 4d cf fe 71 44 96 f6 f1 c6 d7 6d 38 >>>>>>> a5 >>>>>> fd 95 49 >>>>>>> fb cb 0f c9 c6 6a 5f d1 85 ff ba e5 cb ef f8 43 de 7e ac 92 2c b3 >>>>>>> 2c >>>>>> 57 a6 39 >>>>>>> f8 d2 ae c4 06 e8 3d 35 01 e7 30 51 74 e2 28 a2 6f 10 69 3d d8 96 >>>>>>> d8 >>>>>> 61 f5 >>>>>>> ff d3 29 86 26 e2 57 23 dc 8d 77 1a 31 f0 6f df a7 50 34 28 4a e3 >>>>>>> de >>>>>> 55 d0 >>>>>>> a2 6f 8a db a1 54 7a ac 9f d3 e8 c5 1f 55 2c 2e fc 37 c9 4c a1 22 >>>>>>> a4 >>>>>> e4 20 77 >>>>>>> Platform Port Transmit Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Transmit >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Transmit Size: 00 00 00 >>>>>>> 10 Platform Port Transmit Buffer: 01 00 01 00 04 00 00 00 11 82 00 >>>>>>> 00 00 >>>>>> 04 64 >>>>>>> 0a >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Receive >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Receive Size: 00 00 04 10 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Buffer: 01 00 01 00 04 01 00 00 11 02 00 00 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 04 64 >>>>>>> 06 84 86 e0 3e 11 8b 72 c3 92 16 95 d5 32 0f 81 3d d1 0e d0 f8 3a >>>>>>> e6 >>>>>> 20 fe >>>>>>> d8 ae 5a c1 27 2c 18 1f 60 40 fa 89 10 05 33 f7 35 9d 5c 35 29 0d >>>>>>> b3 >>>>>> 26 94 >>>>>>> 48 eb 75 a3 d5 a8 74 22 80 56 40 cc 74 60 c1 03 d5 32 5d 3d 24 4c >>>>>>> b3 >>>>>> 5e b2 >>>>>>> f5 5b 61 f1 d7 fa 40 71 45 af 67 c5 fc 5a ee 32 10 5f eb 6c 68 be >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> e1 0a e9 >>>>>>> 23 0d 06 6d fb b8 af 3a 9a 33 d1 b0 eb 89 5f c9 26 ba b8 91 ab cd >>>>>>> 55 >>>>>> 90 24 >>>>>>> 22 1b 3b 15 11 fe 61 22 de ae d7 19 45 b1 bf 09 09 2f c7 8f 57 b1 >>>>>>> 2b >>>>>> 37 b5 >>>>>>> 9d 4d f2 8b 2d ea 29 f5 17 bb 11 2f 5b 59 1b 43 65 d1 60 15 b9 ba >>>>>>> ca >>>>>> 0b a4 >>>>>>> bd 25 ec ba 5d 55 45 ab 02 2d fb 16 3e d6 82 01 a7 62 1a c7 77 77 >>>>>>> da >>>>>> 5f 4d >>>>>>> f2 a2 f5 14 24 e8 ab 63 16 a4 5d f0 ec 5e 1c 9a 72 a2 86 dd 2b ba >>>>>>> 88 >>>>>> d5 98 >>>>>>> 56 c7 1c 63 2e 59 eb 4a a7 df 55 7e 0c 77 ae de 9b 88 e2 93 47 27 >>>>>>> 62 >>>>>> c7 d4 >>>>>>> 0e 5d a4 16 05 ca 78 bd b9 67 d9 e7 c1 c8 41 23 94 de ae 5f e7 b6 >>>>>>> 50 >>>>>> 76 d5 >>>>>>> 4d d5 ce d6 b5 d4 78 53 c0 18 6d 7f c5 f0 34 29 ba 9a 14 ba f2 13 >>>>>>> 07 >>>>>> 4a 0f >>>>>>> e9 bd 1b fa 4e 20 4c 73 5e eb 9a 6d 3c bb 3b 61 e7 bf 71 cc c0 7a >>>>>>> d2 >>>>>> bf a7 >>>>>>> 26 b9 9a bc 2d a0 22 18 12 1d 04 87 30 82 04 a0 30 82 02 88 a0 03 >>>>>>> 02 >>>>>> 01 >>>>>>> 02 02 01 01 30 0d 06 09 2a 86 48 86 f7 0d 01 01 0c 05 00 30 1c 31 >>>>>>> 1a >>>>>> 30 18 >>>>>>> 06 03 55 04 03 0c 11 69 6e 74 65 6c 20 74 65 73 74 20 52 53 41 20 >>>>>>> 43 >>>>>> 41 >>>>>>> 30 1e 17 0d 32 32 30 33 30 33 31 31 34 30 30 33 5a 17 0d 33 32 30 >>>>>>> 32 >>>>>> 32 >>>>>>> 39 31 31 34 30 30 33 5a 30 2b 31 29 30 27 06 03 55 04 03 0c 20 69 >>>>>>> 6e >>>>>> 74 >>>>>>> 65 6c 20 74 65 73 74 20 52 53 41 20 69 6e 74 65 72 6d 65 64 69 61 >>>>>>> 74 >>>>>> 65 >>>>>>> 20 63 65 72 74 30 82 01 a2 30 0d 06 09 2a 86 48 86 f7 0d 01 01 01 >>>>>>> 05 >>>>>> 00 >>>>>>> 03 82 01 8f 00 30 82 01 8a 02 82 01 81 00 ab 97 02 85 a7 a4 8c 17 >>>>>>> 29 >>>>>> 31 0c >>>>>>> b2 0d f6 e4 3d 76 00 ce e1 1b 19 9b e9 84 f5 36 10 1f d5 e6 60 fe >>>>>>> 8a >>>>>> e4 0a >>>>>>> 53 63 23 7c f8 57 8d 7f 2b a8 10 78 dd 40 ef a8 65 33 47 a4 fc b6 >>>>>>> f8 >>>>>> 23 b3 >>>>>>> 4b 28 8e c8 98 29 02 55 93 54 35 5d 2c fd d8 a4 5d 02 bb c5 06 61 >>>>>>> 72 >>>>>> cb 77 >>>>>>> a1 f6 ed 83 68 ec 4f a7 17 4b 29 89 52 40 9a f3 09 20 1e 4d e1 98 >>>>>>> 37 >>>>>> 70 de >>>>>>> 7c b9 77 2a 77 3d 41 e3 09 e4 d2 57 87 4b de 19 b9 c7 74 bc ec ac >>>>>>> 98 >>>>>> b0 0e >>>>>>> 2e 36 1e f7 8d 05 ab d4 a2 2b 0b fc a3 61 8d 08 bb ce 74 0a a1 d4 >>>>>>> b6 >>>>>> 38 80 >>>>>>> ab a8 be f3 d1 5d 5f 6e cd c7 4b af 85 2f a5 e1 5e 74 0c c8 be a2 >>>>>>> 67 >>>>>> 98 c7 >>>>>>> 61 45 d7 2a ee 88 93 4f d5 ef 83 11 dc 37 a0 38 20 97 c9 24 c3 3a >>>>>>> 26 >>>>>> 69 90 >>>>>>> 1e da 97 87 51 55 33 ef bc 13 b8 68 e8 da e0 68 53 90 11 03 83 43 >>>>>>> 85 >>>>>> f6 69 >>>>>>> 7c d7 07 d4 51 72 94 f5 44 02 7c cb bf 2e f0 1c d7 5b ac ab a7 ac >>>>>>> 35 >>>>>> b7 f4 >>>>>>> 19 cc 78 86 b6 ac 38 17 b3 37 09 5d b5 3f 65 e1 a8 7e 7b 42 0d cb >>>>>>> 24 >>>>>> e9 3d >>>>>>> fc d8 06 2e bc b3 1b 1c 2f 26 cf d2 24 f4 f7 7b 22 fd f1 6a 4e a9 >>>>>>> 73 >>>>>> 0a ea c5 >>>>>>> 11 b9 d3 07 57 f6 b7 d4 df 66 2a 84 7b ec 0b 77 93 69 d6 06 e1 96 >>>>>>> 97 >>>>>> 4c 7e >>>>>>> 72 51 be a4 d1 d6 41 33 d8 69 41 f8 3f 57 44 48 82 ad 34 26 e1 2f >>>>>>> f6 >>>>>> d4 fd >>>>>>> dd 6f a7 e1 55 69 5c 64 a6 a2 a1 70 aa 6f dd a0 cb 3c 9f ce 87 13 >>>>>>> 02 >>>>>> 03 01 >>>>>>> 00 01 a3 5e 30 5c 30 0c 06 03 55 1d 13 04 05 30 03 01 01 ff 30 0b >>>>>>> 06 >>>>>> 03 55 >>>>>>> 1d 0f 04 04 03 02 01 fe 30 1d 06 03 55 1d 0e 04 16 04 14 c1 3f 34 >>>>>>> 2e >>>>>> d9 40 >>>>>>> de 6a 8d b4 45 ed 8a a0 6b b6 73 03 2b e5 30 20 06 03 55 1d 25 01 >>>>>>> 01 >>>>>> ff 04 >>>>>>> 16 30 14 06 08 2b 06 01 05 05 07 03 01 06 08 2b 06 01 05 05 07 03 >>>>>>> 02 >>>>>> 30 >>>>>>> 0d 06 09 2a 86 48 86 f7 0d 01 01 0c 05 00 03 82 02 01 00 7d 96 9d >>>>>>> 42 >>>>>> 20 f4 >>>>>>> 5c 80 19 d9 31 >>>>>>> Platform Port Transmit Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Transmit >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Transmit Size: 00 00 00 >>>>>>> 10 Platform Port Transmit Buffer: 01 00 01 00 04 00 00 00 11 82 00 >>>>>>> 00 00 >>>>>> 08 64 >>>>>>> 06 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Receive >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Receive Size: 00 00 04 10 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Buffer: 01 00 01 00 04 01 00 00 11 02 00 00 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 04 64 >>>>>>> 02 d9 f4 22 2b c9 ea 52 0f 3e a8 e1 fb 87 b9 28 8a c6 70 32 5f a5 >>>>>>> 4e >>>>>> a9 a2 >>>>>>> 22 ed 38 36 69 38 20 07 81 f2 b0 80 b6 05 5f b3 26 8b 60 08 ac fa >>>>>>> db >>>>>> 78 08 >>>>>>> 20 c7 c5 3c 70 85 b8 e3 3c 81 45 3e 2b d9 6f e9 bf bf b9 d7 59 bd >>>>>>> 80 >>>>>> 46 87 >>>>>>> 08 f8 72 1e 44 b6 c4 17 2e 0e fe 51 28 d3 a5 d4 18 7e b6 64 ba 45 >>>>>>> 4f >>>>>> bc 51 >>>>>>> dd 38 70 e7 1f 0f 07 4d 75 b5 3e 2c 95 ca 11 0b a7 12 0f 25 8d ed >>>>>>> 0a >>>>>> 4b 6f >>>>>>> 96 e2 14 22 2d f7 96 64 6a c9 3a eb 09 71 89 ae 8d 82 2e 31 d6 46 >>>>>>> 58 >>>>>> 6c 85 >>>>>>> 3b dc 14 1f c3 5c b3 02 fe ef 26 f1 8a d3 70 50 88 45 bd c8 f7 57 >>>>>>> 24 >>>>>> 1b ef 01 >>>>>>> 8b 84 42 30 bb 1b 51 f4 e5 c2 02 6f ae 42 1d 4c a8 08 b2 75 c8 9b >>>>>>> 6c >>>>>> 6f 75 >>>>>>> e9 97 4a b3 f3 17 54 90 3b 1d c1 c7 e7 08 8a 88 5f 42 67 b5 04 4d >>>>>>> 4f >>>>>> b8 b9 >>>>>>> 5f 60 69 3a 1b 6a ee 39 3d 72 09 c4 80 5e 89 15 12 87 39 68 63 7c >>>>>>> 65 >>>>>> ed b4 >>>>>>> f1 12 d9 b9 82 30 74 0b aa 40 14 e0 33 f7 98 af 31 db e8 81 62 92 >>>>>>> e6 >>>>>> fc 9b >>>>>>> 6b 88 f9 cc c1 e4 6f 95 d2 86 f2 34 8f 48 c7 37 45 8e 25 07 26 f7 >>>>>>> 18 >>>>>> 75 04 >>>>>>> 12 e6 16 6f 50 09 26 c9 8e 36 3e 41 6d 90 d0 31 13 e9 47 3c c9 c4 >>>>>>> f3 >>>>>> c1 b0 >>>>>>> 1c 20 1c c8 95 4d 18 8d 46 83 35 fa 95 03 36 88 68 55 df a3 8d 79 >>>>>>> 9b >>>>>> eb 16 >>>>>>> bf 88 38 10 db 8c c2 f1 20 1b 36 a7 3b 44 26 bd c1 29 7f 02 98 a7 >>>>>>> 31 >>>>>> aa cd >>>>>>> 60 c7 ee 15 a4 b2 be 66 07 47 ea 89 95 5f 32 c6 bf 2e b5 66 46 5a >>>>>>> e1 >>>>>> 79 f2 >>>>>>> cd 4a 39 e0 9d f1 74 2f 00 6b e4 60 20 88 f0 53 83 26 6d ee ac a6 >>>>>>> f6 >>>>>> 54 47 >>>>>>> e2 7a 58 a6 29 1d c7 50 a9 91 0c 68 ff fd 7b 25 a2 f3 34 b2 15 bd >>>>>>> f4 >>>>>> 7d cf 9e >>>>>>> f1 4c 0d 86 39 b2 3e 80 e9 94 15 55 c8 af 8c d2 a9 6e 61 ce e5 23 >>>>>>> 22 >>>>>> dc 4e >>>>>>> b8 1c 41 68 7a b2 30 23 1c f2 6e 22 2e bd cc 6a 99 0b 1b eb 58 05 >>>>>>> 1c >>>>>> 04 c3 >>>>>>> 30 82 04 6b 30 82 02 d3 a0 03 02 01 02 02 01 03 30 0d 06 09 2a 86 >>>>>>> 48 >>>>>> 86 >>>>>>> f7 0d 01 01 0c 05 00 30 2b 31 29 30 27 06 03 55 04 03 0c 20 69 6e >>>>>>> 74 >>>>>> 65 6c >>>>>>> 20 74 65 73 74 20 52 53 41 20 69 6e 74 65 72 6d 65 64 69 61 74 65 >>>>>>> 20 >>>>>> 63 >>>>>>> 65 72 74 30 1e 17 0d 32 32 30 33 30 33 31 31 34 30 32 34 5a 17 0d >>>>>>> 33 >>>>>> 32 >>>>>>> 30 32 32 39 31 31 34 30 32 34 5a 30 28 31 26 30 24 06 03 55 04 03 >>>>>>> 0c >>>>>> 1d >>>>>>> 69 6e 74 65 6c 20 74 65 73 74 20 52 53 41 20 72 65 73 70 6f 6e 64 >>>>>>> 65 >>>>>> 72 20 >>>>>>> 63 65 72 74 30 82 01 a2 30 0d 06 09 2a 86 48 86 f7 0d 01 01 01 05 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 03 >>>>>>> 82 01 8f 00 30 82 01 8a 02 82 01 81 00 a3 d7 6e f3 b7 4f 50 46 6c >>>>>>> 67 >>>>>> 7f 61 >>>>>>> 1a 30 85 a7 5a 8d b9 1f 29 76 86 57 5c cd 5c 20 fe b3 74 59 20 69 >>>>>>> 5e >>>>>> 8f de >>>>>>> 22 cb a8 e9 f0 fb 3a 1a 45 be ef 50 46 b3 fc fe 74 ea e5 9d 0e 8d >>>>>>> 3e >>>>>> b8 13 a5 >>>>>>> d2 7b 67 49 f6 6b 2d 7c 97 64 d1 24 ae c4 25 3f bf 67 9a 27 5d 72 >>>>>>> df >>>>>> 23 87 >>>>>>> d9 53 ba 8d de a7 3d cd e4 1c 9f 66 50 f4 e0 b7 96 97 36 2b 1a f6 >>>>>>> 38 >>>>>> d8 7e >>>>>>> 0e c4 70 bc 7c 00 4a 74 89 9b 62 a5 82 d9 6a 69 b7 23 aa 74 9e ef >>>>>>> 7c >>>>>> b9 59 >>>>>>> 12 4c 8f 4e a2 42 5c d1 32 54 39 ea ca 64 e0 33 50 6c df f5 12 8e >>>>>>> 1c >>>>>> 3d 51 >>>>>>> fe da b8 57 6e 7b 42 2d b6 ec 21 92 af 08 f2 89 c8 19 a4 d5 32 56 >>>>>>> 62 >>>>>> c2 a3 >>>>>>> f5 cc ec d4 eb 07 74 28 a5 5c 0b 1c 7a 4e 03 3a d5 c8 4e 39 25 4a >>>>>>> 9b >>>>>> ce 9a >>>>>>> 63 1a 15 2c 98 4b 64 04 2c 9b 7d 92 32 36 33 60 8b ec 2c a8 5d 95 >>>>>>> 74 >>>>>> 06 3f >>>>>>> 83 cb 62 12 84 b8 dd 68 eb 1c 18 6b 84 cc b6 ef 4f a8 3b e1 0f 0a >>>>>>> 09 >>>>>> 46 c6 >>>>>>> 0f fe 24 55 8c 85 a1 3d 37 b1 ff 29 55 5b 23 f1 91 df cc 9d 38 48 >>>>>>> 72 >>>>>> 0a 55 >>>>>>> b7 45 42 25 c3 05 67 b4 bc 17 cd fd a3 7b 1c e4 d8 b1 8b 42 b2 47 >>>>>>> 1b >>>>>> b7 99 >>>>>>> 4d 8a fd fe 52 80 94 58 e0 81 37 9a 91 61 93 e4 49 5e 69 16 32 4c >>>>>>> 03 >>>>>> 7c 42 >>>>>>> 2e d1 >>>>>>> Platform Port Transmit Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Transmit >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Transmit Size: 00 00 00 >>>>>>> 10 Platform Port Transmit Buffer: 01 00 01 00 04 00 00 00 11 82 00 >>>>>>> 00 00 >>>>>> 0c 64 >>>>>>> 02 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Receive >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Receive Size: 00 00 02 74 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Buffer: 01 00 01 00 9d 00 00 00 11 02 00 00 >>>>>>> 64 >>>>>> 02 00 >>>>>>> 00 74 4f e8 47 58 28 7f 27 57 6b 66 80 29 5e cb b2 b2 a3 61 29 77 >>>>>>> 55 >>>>>> 2f 44 >>>>>>> 6e 47 c8 c5 93 ec 90 96 55 fc 6b 27 03 2a 9e ef 28 b5 49 05 02 03 >>>>>>> 01 >>>>>> 00 01 >>>>>>> a3 81 9c 30 81 99 30 0c 06 03 55 1d 13 01 01 ff 04 02 30 00 30 0b >>>>>>> 06 >>>>>> 03 55 >>>>>>> 1d 0f 04 04 03 02 05 e0 30 1d 06 03 55 1d 0e 04 16 04 14 86 f9 ed >>>>>>> fa >>>>>> 46 3d >>>>>>> 7b 2b 5c 16 29 72 c6 b2 4b af b9 b2 8b df 30 31 06 03 55 1d 11 04 >>>>>>> 2a >>>>>> 30 28 >>>>>>> a0 26 06 0a 2b 06 01 04 01 83 1c 82 12 01 a0 18 0c 16 41 43 4d 45 >>>>>>> 3a >>>>>> 57 >>>>>>> 49 44 47 45 54 3a 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 30 30 2a 06 03 55 1d >>>>>>> 25 >>>>>> 01 >>>>>>> 01 ff 04 20 30 1e 06 08 2b 06 01 05 05 07 03 01 06 08 2b 06 01 05 >>>>>>> 05 >>>>>> 07 03 >>>>>>> 02 06 08 2b 06 01 05 05 07 03 09 30 0d 06 09 2a 86 48 86 f7 0d 01 >>>>>>> 01 >>>>>> 0c >>>>>>> 05 00 03 82 01 81 00 81 69 45 3a 56 b5 12 ee 27 57 12 e1 bd 60 b6 >>>>>>> ca >>>>>> c6 a4 >>>>>>> d1 67 8c 8a e4 7c 9f e2 6f 9d b0 6e 6e e1 5d d8 b6 53 ac fb 68 d3 >>>>>>> ee >>>>>> 55 fc >>>>>>> 04 69 ba 33 8d a0 9b cd 2c 6e a4 fd 04 0e ac 5c d4 2f ce d1 89 d9 >>>>>>> 7e >>>>>> a1 e1 >>>>>>> b4 0c 7c 79 bd 2c 51 50 2a 01 7d 06 82 87 f0 1c f3 72 3b 14 6c 45 >>>>>>> e0 >>>>>> 6b 25 >>>>>>> 88 27 8e cb ec 21 98 c0 09 da 78 cc e7 39 10 0d d4 1a c2 0c 6d 31 >>>>>>> 2e >>>>>> 3a 5f >>>>>>> 34 f9 ea 5c 10 c1 90 3a a1 ff 46 7d 16 77 a6 7c b7 f5 ce bf 57 6a >>>>>>> 73 >>>>>> e0 bf f7 >>>>>>> 22 ba 57 d4 a0 b5 67 8c 1e 8c 9c 9b e6 ee 9a 0b 75 69 26 ce 78 de >>>>>>> 24 >>>>>> 21 85 >>>>>>> 99 22 95 c5 fd a3 8a 1d c8 96 80 6a 26 aa c3 59 d9 de a7 31 03 59 >>>>>>> 78 >>>>>> 58 db >>>>>>> c3 7d 0e 3f 97 50 b4 0f 53 41 0d 4b dd 66 8d bb 57 b6 f7 f7 fb 43 >>>>>>> 9e >>>>>> 25 3c >>>>>>> bc fa 20 84 bc 5d f8 71 3b af 6a e1 b1 84 41 d5 17 00 1d 9d 83 59 >>>>>>> b2 >>>>>> ce bd >>>>>>> 40 5a ba c6 52 45 2c 49 ff 10 d4 a1 e9 19 11 b5 3a 87 cc 74 76 f6 >>>>>>> 4d >>>>>> 07 92 >>>>>>> f1 98 53 07 96 89 9e 6c 70 cf 2e 2c 7d f1 dd d3 26 0a a8 39 23 1f >>>>>>> 5c >>>>>> 60 e7 >>>>>>> 32 13 61 04 94 f9 ff 21 2a 00 9c c8 e7 e7 53 ef e0 73 25 be f0 7d >>>>>>> f9 >>>>>> bd 49 >>>>>>> 08 dd c0 1b 68 67 87 a2 8f 8b ed 95 12 dd 01 fc ac 10 b7 d3 60 dc >>>>>>> 03 >>>>>> 2e 8d >>>>>>> ee 9b 85 1c 56 d5 a8 1d bb 0b 75 91 d7 b9 5d b5 f8 57 4f c5 4e 02 >>>>>>> 34 >>>>>> 76 a4 >>>>>>> cd b9 42 c4 58 de 57 dc 75 31 e3 6c 2e 65 d0 Platform Port >>>>>>> Transmit >>>>>>> Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Transmit TransportType: 00 00 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>>> 02 Platform Port Transmit Size: 00 00 00 2c >>>>>>> >>>>>>> //This is the challenge auth. >>>>>>> Platform Port Transmit Buffer: 01 00 01 00 0b 00 00 00 11 83 00 00 >>>>>>> af >>>>>> 2c d9 >>>>>>> aa cb 59 67 ce 3f 7b 8f a5 26 00 4e 1f 1c 4e c3 1e 31 06 be 0d 9e >>>>>>> 4f >>>>>> f8 b1 7c >>>>>>> 2a 39 89 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Command: 00 00 00 01 Platform Port Receive >>>>>>> TransportType: 00 00 00 02 Platform Port Receive Size: 00 00 01 e0 >>>>>>> Platform Port Receive Buffer: 01 00 01 00 78 00 00 00 11 03 80 01 >>>>>>> 6b >>>>>> 3e 6a >>>>>>> 85 12 30 ed ec 1e 27 0e 6e 96 b0 95 68 eb b0 1f 9a 7a 63 f6 bd 04 >>>>>>> 0d >>>>>> 04 cc >>>>>>> 45 0a 03 b9 aa d6 e7 1b 7e 85 04 ae 18 55 8d 47 58 c4 cd 59 61 17 >>>>>>> 8f >>>>>> cf a6 >>>>>>> 2d 0d e2 aa 90 91 06 7c 8e 3b 8b a7 64 7c 72 09 b2 9c 89 5b f1 30 >>>>>>> 47 >>>>>> e7 5b >>>>>>> 07 58 00 00 9c 43 d9 7b a3 ae c7 d4 bd 5e a8 db 74 b3 81 97 10 6e >>>>>>> 2f >>>>>> 22 5a >>>>>>> 26 c0 09 02 43 1d c1 3b dd cf e8 13 33 ff dc 02 39 15 2b 98 16 b5 >>>>>>> eb >>>>>> 8e 63 >>>>>>> 32 5a 3e 2a 6a 00 96 8e 42 5d 11 46 a6 7e d5 a8 76 11 94 2c a8 2c >>>>>>> c7 >>>>>> 6d 48 >>>>>>> 94 80 a0 fd 9a 7e 4a 84 59 c0 25 17 7d 0f d5 0d 93 75 02 1e 61 ef >>>>>>> 5e >>>>>> 5d 06 >>>>>>> 80 64 4d 6a 47 91 c7 b1 ca e3 d5 ab b3 6c 97 8a f0 56 39 e6 3d a0 >>>>>>> ad >>>>>> 96 20 >>>>>>> 14 43 fc 83 5d 21 08 78 e8 85 69 a0 d2 e6 9a c9 a9 f6 96 66 ee 80 >>>>>>> a6 >>>>>> 06 a6 >>>>>>> a6 ee cb 9b 7c e4 65 5f a5 0c 5a d9 5e de 50 d1 ab 73 8b c4 f7 3a >>>>>>> f2 >>>>>> 62 59 >>>>>>> 27 16 fa 42 1b e1 db 19 76 a8 40 06 25 d3 28 54 bf dd d4 75 1e 4f >>>>>>> 40 >>>>>> d0 c4 >>>>>>> 3e 1e 60 e7 4b 9b c9 c8 98 db a4 74 8f 86 39 ae 76 9c f9 c9 fe 63 >>>>>>> ef >>>>>> 34 ab >>>>>>> 4d 0b 14 22 d0 d6 9e a3 fd 12 ab c3 7c 61 fd ea 09 dc 2d ad 78 6e >>>>>>> ce >>>>>> 13 2b >>>>>>> 95 36 83 34 3a 1b ef d3 fd 07 de b2 df c7 7a 83 bd 6e ab 51 70 99 >>>>>>> 4e >>>>>> 28 07 >>>>>>> de 63 42 ab 81 96 79 7f 30 27 28 4a 3e a1 8f 42 5f 7d cd 8f ec 86 >>>>>>> e0 >>>>>> ea 2b >>>>>>> fb 05 c2 ce ce 69 ae 4e 5c dd 95 85 11 23 a3 80 85 40 65 e3 a1 92 >>>>>>> 18 >>>>>> 9a dc >>>>>>> 31 ac 13 24 a3 a9 b9 5c 95 f5 b5 b5 08 ee 7d d8 ff 44 42 77 c4 09 >>>>>>> 25 >>>>>> 35 7c >>>>>>> b4 0b 64 77 ea 74 19 b7 b0 c1 04 6d 42 7e ab 32 91 e5 b1 59 2d 60 >>>>>>> 31 >>>>>> 11 5f >>>>>>> 38 52 36 d0 ba c0 73 d5 fb 5c b6 82 a1 00 00 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> from spdm_emu last message is better formatted. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SpdmReceiveRequest[0] (0x24): >>>>>>> 0000: 11 83 00 00 af 2c d9 aa cb 59 67 ce 3f 7b 8f a5 26 00 4e 1f >>>>>>> 1c >>>>>> 4e c3 >>>>>>> 1e 31 06 be 0d 9e 4f f8 b1 >>>>>>> 0020: 7c 2a 39 89 >>>>>>> SpdmSendResponse[0] ... >>>>>>> m1m2 hash - 6b c2 91 d6 c1 fe 1c 5e c9 bf 04 f6 fd 0f b1 58 9d 56 >>>>>>> d3 >>>>>> af 69 >>>>>>> 08 3b eb 06 ba 6d b0 d2 e2 33 46 8a d8 ff 4d 9a 44 13 d2 04 57 e9 >>>>>>> b9 >>>>>> ce b7 >>>>>>> b2 05 >>>>>>> SpdmSendResponse[0] (0x1d6): >>>>>>> 0000: 11 03 80 01 6b 3e 6a 85 12 30 ed ec 1e 27 0e 6e 96 b0 95 68 >>>>>>> eb >>>>>> b0 1f >>>>>>> 9a 7a 63 f6 bd 04 0d 04 cc >>>>>>> 0020: 45 0a 03 b9 aa d6 e7 1b 7e 85 04 ae 18 55 8d 47 58 c4 cd 59 >>>>>>> 61 >>>>>> 17 8f >>>>>>> cf a6 2d 0d e2 aa 90 91 06 >>>>>>> 0040: 7c 8e 3b 8b a7 64 7c 72 09 b2 9c 89 5b f1 30 47 e7 5b 07 58 >>>>>>> 00 >>>>>> 00 9c >>>>>>> 43 d9 7b a3 ae c7 d4 bd 5e >>>>>>> 0060: a8 db 74 b3 81 97 10 6e 2f 22 5a 26 c0 09 02 43 1d c1 3b dd >>>>>>> cf >>>>>> e8 13 >>>>>>> 33 ff dc 02 39 15 2b 98 16 >>>>>>> 0080: b5 eb 8e 63 32 5a 3e 2a 6a 00 96 8e 42 5d 11 46 a6 7e d5 a8 >>>>>>> 76 >>>>>> 11 94 >>>>>>> 2c a8 2c c7 6d 48 94 80 a0 >>>>>>> 00a0: fd 9a 7e 4a 84 59 c0 25 17 7d 0f d5 0d 93 75 02 1e 61 ef 5e >>>>>>> 5d >>>>>> 06 80 >>>>>>> 64 4d 6a 47 91 c7 b1 ca e3 >>>>>>> 00c0: d5 ab b3 6c 97 8a f0 56 39 e6 3d a0 ad 96 20 14 43 fc 83 5d >>>>>>> 21 >>>>>> 08 78 >>>>>>> e8 85 69 a0 d2 e6 9a c9 a9 >>>>>>> 00e0: f6 96 66 ee 80 a6 06 a6 a6 ee cb 9b 7c e4 65 5f a5 0c 5a d9 >>>>>>> 5e >>>>>> de 50 >>>>>>> d1 ab 73 8b c4 f7 3a f2 62 >>>>>>> 0100: 59 27 16 fa 42 1b e1 db 19 76 a8 40 06 25 d3 28 54 bf dd d4 >>>>>>> 75 >>>>>> 1e 4f >>>>>>> 40 d0 c4 3e 1e 60 e7 4b 9b >>>>>>> 0120: c9 c8 98 db a4 74 8f 86 39 ae 76 9c f9 c9 fe 63 ef 34 ab 4d >>>>>>> 0b >>>>>> 14 22 >>>>>>> d0 d6 9e a3 fd 12 ab c3 7c >>>>>>> 0140: 61 fd ea 09 dc 2d ad 78 6e ce 13 2b 95 36 83 34 3a 1b ef d3 >>>>>>> fd >>>>>> 07 de >>>>>>> b2 df c7 7a 83 bd 6e ab 51 >>>>>>> 0160: 70 99 4e 28 07 de 63 42 ab 81 96 79 7f 30 27 28 4a 3e a1 8f >>>>>>> 42 >>>>>> 5f 7d >>>>>>> cd 8f ec 86 e0 ea 2b fb 05 >>>>>>> 0180: c2 ce ce 69 ae 4e 5c dd 95 85 11 23 a3 80 85 40 65 e3 a1 92 >>>>>>> 18 >>>>>> 9a dc >>>>>>> 31 ac 13 24 a3 a9 b9 5c 95 >>>>>>> 01a0: f5 b5 b5 08 ee 7d d8 ff 44 42 77 c4 09 25 35 7c b4 0b 64 77 >>>>>>> ea >>>>>> 74 19 >>>>>>> b7 b0 c1 04 6d 42 7e ab 32 >>>>>>> 01c0: 91 e5 b1 59 2d 60 31 11 5f 38 52 36 d0 ba c0 73 d5 fb 5c b6 >>>>>>> 82 >>>>>> a1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I vaguely recall the running hash need for a challenge auth being >>>>>> rather hard >>>>>>> to get right but I had >>>>>>> the advantage of being able to compare how both sides built it up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ah. Been a while, but IIRC correctly the spec doesn't make it >>>>>>> clear when signatures should be ASN.1. My basis for choosing >>>>>>> combinations in that code were what libSPDM did at the time. I >>>>>> remember >>>>>>> a bunch of trial and error and also hand decoding binary to try to >>>>>>> figure out what the encodings were. I also enjoyed those places >>>>>>> where various different ASN.1 encoded structures were concatenated >>>>>>> rather that encoded in one go - hence no cheap way to index to the >>>>>>> next one. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm reviewing a nice short 972 page spec draft this week (which >>>>>>> will >>>>>> remain >>>>>>> unnamed :) but if I get time I'll see if I can test that path >>>>>>> before Tuesday. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think I ran basic tests on all the protocol types, but it was a >>>>>> long >>>>>>> time ago so possible I missed one. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I meant to seek a spec clarification but haven't gotten around to >>>>>>> it >>>>>> yet. >>>>>>> Request from DMTF people was to file tickets against he spec for >>>>>> stuff >>>>>>> like that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Lorenzo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> New Potential topic. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Scheduler Tuneables from NUMA topology. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is yangyicong's topic but I'll attempt to summarize: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ef3b3e55-8be9-595f-6d54-886d13a7e2fd@h >>>>>> isi >>>>>> l >>>>>>> icon.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The scheduler contains a bunch of tunables including this one >>>>>>> which >>>>>> is >>>>>>> "migration cost" >>>>>>> This value is used to make decisions in load balancing + to >>>>>>> control >>>>>> the >>>>>>> frequency of load balancing >>>>>>> to avoid doing it too often. The default value has been fixed for >>>>>>> a >>>>>> long time >>>>>>> and systems have changed a lot in that time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Currently the value is tunable via debugfs, but in the above >>>>>>> thread >>>>>> the >>>>>>> proposal >>>>>>> to somehow base the value on the system topology was made. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We haven't yet proceeded very far with this but if we can get >>>>>> appropriate >>>>>>> people for >>>>>>> the call it may be a good opportunity to do some brainstorming, >>>>>> particularly >>>>>>> as >>>>>>> we don't have ready access to that many machine topologies so >>>>>>> testing >>>>>> any >>>>>>> proposal >>>>>>> will be very challenging. Also I fear this space is only going to >>>>>>> get >>>>>> more >>>>>>> complex >>>>>>> as systems get larger over the next year or two. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Next week may be too soon for such a discussion though given the >>>>>> short >>>>>>> notice! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +CC Vincent and Dietmar, but please drag anyone else in who is >>>>>> relevant to >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> discussion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I might also mention this topic at the LDCG meeting this week to >>>>>>> see >>>>>> if we >>>>>>> can >>>>>>> interest from others who might be able to help with data + testing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 锟斤拷 2022锟斤拷4锟斤拷14锟秸o拷锟斤拷锟斤拷8:00锟斤 >>> 拷 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> linaro-open-discussions-request@op-lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-o >>>>> pen- >>>>>> disc >>>>>>> ussions-request@op-lists.linaro.org>写锟斤拷锟斤拷 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Send Linaro-open-discussions mailing list submissions to >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-open-disc >>>>> ussi >>>>>> ons >>>>>>> @op-lists.linaro.org> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject >>>>>>> or body 'help' to >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> linaro-open-discussions-request@op-lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-o >>>>> pen- >>>>>> disc >>>>>>> ussions-request@op-lists.linaro.org> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> linaro-open-discussions-owner@op-lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-ope >>>>> n-di >>>>>> scu >>>>>>> ssions-owner@op-lists.linaro.org> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more >>>>>>> specific than "Re: Contents of Linaro-open-discussions digest..." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Today's Topics: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. Re: LOD Call notes: 22 March 2022 - vCPU Hotplug Update >>>>>>> (Jonathan Cameron) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> --- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Message: 1 >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 19:17:32 +0100 >>>>>>> From: Jonathan Cameron >>>>>>> >>> <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.commailto:Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Subject: [Linaro-open-discussions] Re: LOD Call notes: 22 March >>>>>>> 2022 >>>>>> - >>>>>>> vCPU Hotplug Update >>>>>>> To: Ilkka Koskinen >>>>>>> >>> <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.commailto:ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cc: >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-open-disc >>>>> ussi >>>>>> ons >>>>>>> @op-lists.linaro.org> >>>>>>> Message-ID: >>>>>>> >>> <20220413191732.00000e4e@Huawei.commailto:20220413191732.0000 >>>>>> 0e4e@Huawei.com>> >>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Ilkka Koskinen >>>>>>> >>> <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.commailto:ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, Jonathan Cameron via Linaro-open-discussions >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A quick set of notes on the discussion on vCPU hotplug. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Great to have Ed join the discussion. If we are going to have >>>>>>> further calls on this topic we may want to move the time to be >>>>>>> more friendly for the US. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Current status >>>>>>> * ACPI spec change via code first route approved. >>>>>>> * Kernel patches being reworked / rebased by ARM. Expected to be >>>>>>> sent out in 5.19 cycle. >>>>>>> * QEMU patches being updated by Huawei. Will do at least some >>>>>>> light testing and then push out a public git tree so that others >>>>>>> can test - will >>>>>> aim >>>>>>> to do this so it aligns with kernel code availability. >>>>>>> * Ed (Ampere) gave an update to say they are interested in pushing >>>>>> this >>>>>>> forwards ASAP and have customer / OS vendor engagement which will >>>>>>> be very useful in moving towards a complete solution, particularly >>>>>> ensuring >>>>>>> good test coverage etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Noted that current QEMU patches may not cover all corner cases, >>>>>>> for example live migration of VMs that have vCPUs hotplugged. >>>>>>> Might 'just work' >>>>>>> but we haven't tested it yet so probably not. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Given we didn't really add anything on DOE / SPDM over previous >>>>>> calls, >>>>>>> I don't plan to send out anything on that topic this time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks to Joyce for hosting the call. If I noted down anything >>>>>> wrong, >>>>>>> or incomplete let the list know. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Linaro-open-discussions mailing list -- >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-open-disc >>>>> ussi >>>>>> ons >>>>>>> @op-lists.linaro.org> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LOD/Linaro+Open+Discussions+ >>>>>> Hom >>>>>> e >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the great meeting and the update! As Ed mentioned (and >>>>>>> you wrote above), we're interested in joining the vCPU Hotplug >>>>>> development. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Ilkka >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Great to have you on board for this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Status wise, on QEMU side we have the new interface up and running >>>>>>> (it was a whole 2 lines of code once we'd dealt with some rebasing >>>>>> related >>>>>>> issues). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rather more changes were needed to make it work sensibly on top of >>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>> Shan's >>>>>>> QEMU topology configuration patch set. >>>>>>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20220403145953.10522-1-gshan@re >>>>>>> dh >>>>>>> at.com/ >>>>>>> The code going through some light internal review before we put it >>>>>>> up somewhere public. Note it's definitely not production quality >>>>>>> code but it is >>>>>> somewhere >>>>>>> to start from. Given Easter related vacations I doubt we'll get >>>>>> enough >>>>>>> eyes on it until next week. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We were thrown briefly by the fact there is a recently added >>>>>>> apcica/actbl2.h entry for MADT_ONLINE_CAPABLE but it's a different >>>>>> bit. >>>>>>> Seems x86 folk wanted something similar last year. We'll have to >>>>>>> do something ugly in ACPICA to mangle the name for the new bit to >>>>>>> avoid that >>>>>> collision. >>>>>>> Lorenzo, I'm assuming the ACPCIA one line patch to add that define >>>>>>> is something the ARM team will deal with? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are some known limitations though that we'll need to sort >>>>>>> out >>>>>> before >>>>>>> upstreaming the QEMU support. One of which is SVE currently breaks >>>>>> things. >>>>>>> Plenty of time though as kernel needs to be upstream first anyway. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Testing wise we are using QEMU on top of QEMU so we can poke >>>>>>> corners >>>>>> of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> architecture don't have hardware for (e.g. SVE :). Even on a >>>>>>> rubbish >>>>>> x86 >>>>>>> desktop it's not that slow :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lorenzo, any update on kernel side of things or expected time >>>>>>> scale >>>>>> for >>>>>>> more information? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Obviously we have some hacked patches based on Salil's original >>>>>> proposal >>>>>>> that sanity check the QEMU side of things but I suspect the final >>>>>> version >>>>>>> will look rather different :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> One question on the spec change for Lorenzo. It's not entirely >>>>>>> clear but I think we should not be using _MAT when 'hotplugging' the >>> vCPUs? >>>>>>> For now the QEMU code provides the relevant entries anyway but it >>>>>>> would be nice to drop that if not necessary (it's not a huge >>>>>>> amount of code or complexity though so not a big thing either way). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks and an early happy Easter to those celebrating on Sunday. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Br, Ilkka >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Subject: Digest Footer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Linaro-open-discussions mailing list -- >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-open-disc >>>>> ussi >>>>>> ons >>>>>>> @op-lists.linaro.org> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> linaro-open-discussions-leave@op-lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-ope >>>>> n-di >>>>>> scus >>>>>>> sions-leave@op-lists.linaro.org> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> End of Linaro-open-discussions Digest, Vol 19, Issue 1 >>>>>>> ****************************************************** >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Linaro-open-discussions mailing list -- >>>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LOD/Linaro+Open+Discussions+ >>>>>> Hom >>>>>> e >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Linaro-open-discussions mailing list -- >>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>>> https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LOD/Linaro+Open+Discussions+ >>>>>> Hom e IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any >>>>>> attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are >>>>>> not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do >>> not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store >>> or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are >>> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, >>> please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any >>> other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any >>> medium. Thank you. >>>> > > . >
.
Subject: Digest Footer
Linaro-open-discussions mailing list -- linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-open-discussions-leave@op-lists.linaro.org
End of Linaro-open-discussions Digest, Vol 32, Issue 10
[Changed Subject since this thread has been used for too many things at once]
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi James, Jonathan,Lorenz,Salil,all
I got request from Salil that he wants to have a sync up meeting about the vCPU Hotplug in next week, since Salil & James will present the latest vCPU Hotplug kernel/Qemu status in the KVM Forum 2023 conference(June 14th to 15th)
Are you all available next week(default is next Tue, but I can change the time according to your time.)
I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up we should wait for them to confirm.
AFAICS the planned LOD is for June 27th unless I am missing something, what do you mean by "default is next Tue" ?
Anyway - waiting for others to show up, I don't think I can provide much help myself on this topic at the moment.
Thanks, Lorenzo
Hello,
-----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM
[Changed Subject since this thread has been used for too many things at once]
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi James, Jonathan,Lorenz,Salil,all
I got request from Salil that he wants to have a sync up meeting about the vCPU Hotplug in next week, since Salil & James will present the latest vCPU Hotplug kernel/Qemu status in the KVM Forum 2023 conference(June 14th to 15th)
Are you all available next week(default is next Tue, but I can change the time according to your time.)
I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up we should wait for them to confirm.
Thank you!
I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day next week. The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should highlight as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk concise and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes which also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
@James, Do you think it is useful to have this meeting?
AFAICS the planned LOD is for June 27th unless I am missing something, what do you mean by "default is next Tue" ?
We did not have meeting for VCPU Hotplug discussion for the month of May and previous few months (since Feb, I think). :)
Anyway - waiting for others to show up, I don't think I can provide much help myself on this topic at the moment.
Thanks, Lorenzo
Hi Salil,
I got the automatic reply from James that he is on vacation and won't come back until June 6th. Will arrange the meeting once he gives some feedback.
在 2023年6月1日,下午9:58,Salil Mehta salil.mehta@huawei.com 写道:
Hello,
-----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM
[Changed Subject since this thread has been used for too many things at once]
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi James, Jonathan,Lorenz,Salil,all
I got request from Salil that he wants to have a sync up meeting about the vCPU Hotplug in next week, since Salil & James will present the latest vCPU Hotplug kernel/Qemu status in the KVM Forum 2023 conference(June 14th to 15th)
Are you all available next week(default is next Tue, but I can change the time according to your time.)
I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up we should wait for them to confirm.
Thank you!
I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day next week. The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should highlight as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk concise and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes which also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
@James, Do you think it is useful to have this meeting?
AFAICS the planned LOD is for June 27th unless I am missing something, what do you mean by "default is next Tue" ?
We did not have meeting for VCPU Hotplug discussion for the month of May and previous few months (since Feb, I think). :)
Anyway - waiting for others to show up, I don't think I can provide much help myself on this topic at the moment.
Thanks, Lorenzo
Thanks Joyce
Hi Joyce,
From: Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 4:04 PM
Hi Salil,
I got the automatic reply from James that he is on vacation and won't come back until June 6th. Will arrange the meeting once he gives some feedback.
Thanks for the update. I saw that as well. Let us wait for his reply after he comes back.
Thanks
在 2023年6月1日,下午9:58,Salil Mehta salil.mehta@huawei.com 写道:
Hello,
-----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM
[Changed Subject since this thread has been used for too many things at once]
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi James, Jonathan,Lorenz,Salil,all
I got request from Salil that he wants to have a sync up meeting about
the vCPU Hotplug in next week, since Salil & James will present the latest vCPU Hotplug kernel/Qemu status
in the KVM Forum 2023 conference(June 14th to 15th)
Are you all available next week(default is next Tue, but I can change
the time according to your time.)
I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-
up
we should wait for them to confirm.
Thank you!
I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day
next week.
The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should
highlight
as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk
concise
and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes
which
also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
@James, Do you think it is useful to have this meeting?
AFAICS the planned LOD is for June 27th unless I am missing something, what do you mean by "default is next Tue" ?
We did not have meeting for VCPU Hotplug discussion for the month of May and previous few months (since Feb, I think). :)
Anyway - waiting for others to show up, I don't think I can provide much
help
myself on this topic at the moment.
Thanks, Lorenzo
Thanks Joyce
Hi Joyce,
I would like to attend too, if possible.
Will the meeting details be available once it is arranged?
Thank you in advance, Miguel
On 1 Jun 2023, at 15:04, Joyce Qi via Linaro-open-discussions linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org wrote:
Hi Salil,
I got the automatic reply from James that he is on vacation and won't come back until June 6th. Will arrange the meeting once he gives some feedback.
在 2023年6月1日,下午9:58,Salil Mehta salil.mehta@huawei.com 写道:
Hello,
-----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM
[Changed Subject since this thread has been used for too many things at once]
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi James, Jonathan,Lorenz,Salil,all
I got request from Salil that he wants to have a sync up meeting about the vCPU Hotplug in next week, since Salil & James will present the latest vCPU Hotplug kernel/Qemu status in the KVM Forum 2023 conference(June 14th to 15th)
Are you all available next week(default is next Tue, but I can change the time according to your time.)
I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up we should wait for them to confirm.
Thank you!
I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day next week. The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should highlight as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk concise and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes which also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
@James, Do you think it is useful to have this meeting?
AFAICS the planned LOD is for June 27th unless I am missing something, what do you mean by "default is next Tue" ?
We did not have meeting for VCPU Hotplug discussion for the month of May and previous few months (since Feb, I think). :)
Anyway - waiting for others to show up, I don't think I can provide much help myself on this topic at the moment.
Thanks, Lorenzo
Thanks Joyce -- Linaro-open-discussions mailing list -- linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LOD/Linaro+Open+Discussions+Home
Hi Miguel,
Welcome to join,this time will be mainly focus on the latest vCPU Hotplug status update.
@Salil, Maybe you can share more detailed about the vCPU Hotplug?
Thanks Joyce
在 2023年6月2日,下午5:02,Miguel Luis miguel.luis@oracle.com 写道:
Hi Joyce,
I would like to attend too, if possible.
Will the meeting details be available once it is arranged?
Thank you in advance, Miguel
On 1 Jun 2023, at 15:04, Joyce Qi via Linaro-open-discussions linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org wrote:
Hi Salil,
I got the automatic reply from James that he is on vacation and won't come back until June 6th. Will arrange the meeting once he gives some feedback.
在 2023年6月1日,下午9:58,Salil Mehta salil.mehta@huawei.com 写道:
Hello,
-----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM
[Changed Subject since this thread has been used for too many things at once]
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi James, Jonathan,Lorenz,Salil,all
I got request from Salil that he wants to have a sync up meeting about the vCPU Hotplug in next week, since Salil & James will present the latest vCPU Hotplug kernel/Qemu status in the KVM Forum 2023 conference(June 14th to 15th)
Are you all available next week(default is next Tue, but I can change the time according to your time.)
I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up we should wait for them to confirm.
Thank you!
I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day next week. The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should highlight as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk concise and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes which also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
@James, Do you think it is useful to have this meeting?
AFAICS the planned LOD is for June 27th unless I am missing something, what do you mean by "default is next Tue" ?
We did not have meeting for VCPU Hotplug discussion for the month of May and previous few months (since Feb, I think). :)
Anyway - waiting for others to show up, I don't think I can provide much help myself on this topic at the moment.
Thanks, Lorenzo
Thanks Joyce -- Linaro-open-discussions mailing list -- linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LOD/Linaro+Open+Discussions+Home
From: Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org Sent: Friday, June 2, 2023 10:29 AM
Hi Miguel,
Welcome to join,this time will be mainly focus on the latest vCPU Hotplug status update.
@Salil, Maybe you can share more detailed about the vCPU Hotplug?
I wanted to hold it for KVM Forum talk sync-up as you know for us there is no other way to do that. Let us wait for James to reply.
Thanks Joyce
在 2023年6月2日,下午5:02,Miguel Luis miguel.luis@oracle.com 写道:
Hi Joyce,
I would like to attend too, if possible.
Will the meeting details be available once it is arranged?
Thank you in advance, Miguel
On 1 Jun 2023, at 15:04, Joyce Qi via Linaro-open-discussions linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org wrote:
Hi Salil,
I got the automatic reply from James that he is on vacation and won't come back until June 6th. Will arrange the meeting once he gives some feedback.
在 2023年6月1日,下午9:58,Salil Mehta salil.mehta@huawei.com 写道:
Hello,
-----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM
[Changed Subject since this thread has been used for too many things at once]
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi James, Jonathan,Lorenz,Salil,all
I got request from Salil that he wants to have a sync up meeting about the vCPU Hotplug in next week, since Salil & James will present the latest vCPU Hotplug kernel/Qemu status in the KVM Forum 2023 conference(June 14th to 15th)
Are you all available next week(default is next Tue, but I can change the time according to your time.)
I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up we should wait for them to confirm.
Thank you!
I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day next week. The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should highlight as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk concise and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes which also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
@James, Do you think it is useful to have this meeting?
AFAICS the planned LOD is for June 27th unless I am missing something, what do you mean by "default is next Tue" ?
We did not have meeting for VCPU Hotplug discussion for the month of May and previous few months (since Feb, I think). :)
Anyway - waiting for others to show up, I don't think I can provide much help myself on this topic at the moment.
Thanks, Lorenzo
Thanks Joyce -- Linaro-open-discussions mailing list -- linaro-open-discussions@op-
lists.linaro.org
https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LOD/Linaro+Open+Discussions+Home
Hello,
On 01/06/2023 14:58, Salil Mehta wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi James, Jonathan,Lorenz,Salil,all
I got request from Salil that he wants to have a sync up meeting about the vCPU Hotplug in next week, since Salil & James will present the latest vCPU Hotplug kernel/Qemu status in the KVM Forum 2023 conference(June 14th to 15th)
Are you all available next week(default is next Tue, but I can change the time according to your time.)
I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up we should wait for them to confirm.
This week is an internal conference, so free time will be tricky. I'm free 10am until noon on Tuesday to Thursday UK time... (If you put anything at 10am, I need to have seen it the day before)
I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day next week. The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should highlight as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk concise and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes which also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
I figured you want the majority of time for the qemu stuff and discussion.
I've got 5 minutes worth of material to describe what this is for, why 'copy-x86' doesn't work for arm64, and what we plan to do instead. Draft slides are attached.
That should give you fifteen minutes for the Qemu side of it, and ten minutes for discussion.
You sent an earlier email too: I'm flying on Tuesday, we're almost certainly on the same flight. I'm staying at the grand hotel in Brno.
Thanks,
James
Hi James, Thanks for replying back.
[There some important non-technical information I need to share with you which can affect the conference. I can't share that here in LOD as it is related to medical]
From: James Morse james.morse@arm.com Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 5:27 PM
Hello,
On 01/06/2023 14:58, Salil Mehta wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi James, Jonathan,Lorenz,Salil,all
I got request from Salil that he wants to have a sync up meeting about
the vCPU Hotplug in next week, since Salil & James will present the latest vCPU Hotplug kernel/Qemu status
in the KVM Forum 2023 conference(June 14th to 15th)
Are you all available next week(default is next Tue, but I can change
the time
according to your time.)
I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up we should wait for them to confirm.
This week is an internal conference, so free time will be tricky. I'm free 10am until noon on Tuesday to Thursday UK time... (If you put anything at 10am, I need to have seen it the day before)
Possible to do it tomorrow between 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM BST (will keep it concise?)
I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day next week. The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should highlight as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk concise and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes which also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
I figured you want the majority of time for the qemu stuff and discussion.
It looks like Paolo has put us in the second last talk of the 2nd day so I suspect there is a scope to slip (I think) but thanks for your consideration.
I am also planning to keep the slides to the point.
I've got 5 minutes worth of material to describe what this is for, why 'copy-x86' doesn't work for arm64, and what we plan to do instead. Draft slides are attached.
Sure, makes sense. Would you like to add a brief flow of the initialization?
That should give you fifteen minutes for the Qemu side of it, and ten minutes for discussion.
Ok.
You sent an earlier email too: I'm flying on Tuesday, we're almost certainly on the same flight. I'm staying at the grand hotel in Brno.
Ok. I have not confirmed the hotel for some reason till now. [will update you through different channel]
Thanks Salil
Hi Salil,
On 05/06/2023 18:00, Salil Mehta wrote:
From: James Morse james.morse@arm.com Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 5:27 PM On 01/06/2023 14:58, Salil Mehta wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up we should wait for them to confirm.
This week is an internal conference, so free time will be tricky. I'm free 10am until noon on Tuesday to Thursday UK time... (If you put anything at 10am, I need to have seen it the day before)
Possible to do it tomorrow between 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM BST (will keep it concise?)
Sure. Lorenzo would you be able to host it? (I'm not sure how the whole recording stuff works)
I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day next week. The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should highlight as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk concise and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes which also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
I figured you want the majority of time for the qemu stuff and discussion.
It looks like Paolo has put us in the second last talk of the 2nd day so I suspect there is a scope to slip (I think) but thanks for your consideration.
I am also planning to keep the slides to the point.
I've got 5 minutes worth of material to describe what this is for, why 'copy-x86' doesn't work for arm64, and what we plan to do instead. Draft slides are attached.
Sure, makes sense. Would you like to add a brief flow of the initialization?
The boot flow? Makes sense..
Thanks,
James
From: James Morse james.morse@arm.com Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 6:07 PM
Hi Salil,
On 05/06/2023 18:00, Salil Mehta wrote:
From: James Morse james.morse@arm.com Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 5:27 PM On 01/06/2023 14:58, Salil Mehta wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up we should wait for them to confirm.
This week is an internal conference, so free time will be tricky. I'm free 10am until noon on Tuesday to Thursday UK time... (If you put anything at 10am, I need to have seen it the day before)
Possible to do it tomorrow between 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM BST (will keep it concise?)
Sure. Lorenzo would you be able to host it? (I'm not sure how the whole recording stuff works)
Thanks
I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day next week. The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should highlight as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk concise and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes which also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
I figured you want the majority of time for the qemu stuff and discussion.
It looks like Paolo has put us in the second last talk of the 2nd day so I suspect there is a scope to slip (I think) but thanks for your consideration.
I am also planning to keep the slides to the point.
I've got 5 minutes worth of material to describe what this is for, why 'copy-x86' doesn't work for arm64, and what we plan to do instead. Draft slides are attached.
Sure, makes sense. Would you like to add a brief flow of the initialization?
The boot flow? Makes sense..
Correct. A picture/sequence-diagram is worth thousand words. :)
Thanks Salil
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 19:16, Salil Mehta salil.mehta@huawei.com wrote:
From: James Morse james.morse@arm.com Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 6:07 PM
Hi Salil,
On 05/06/2023 18:00, Salil Mehta wrote:
From: James Morse james.morse@arm.com Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 5:27 PM On 01/06/2023 14:58, Salil Mehta wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up we should wait for them to confirm.
This week is an internal conference, so free time will be tricky. I'm free 10am until noon on Tuesday to Thursday UK time... (If you put anything at 10am, I need to have seen it the day before)
Possible to do it tomorrow between 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM BST (will keep it concise?)
Sure. Lorenzo would you be able to host it? (I'm not sure how the whole recording stuff works)
Thanks
I don't know if Joyce has time to set the call up, it is a bit too tight IMO.
Maybe Wednesday is better but I will let her comment on this.
Thanks, Lorenzo
I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day next week. The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should highlight as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk concise and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes which also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
I figured you want the majority of time for the qemu stuff and discussion.
It looks like Paolo has put us in the second last talk of the 2nd day so I suspect there is a scope to slip (I think) but thanks for your consideration.
I am also planning to keep the slides to the point.
I've got 5 minutes worth of material to describe what this is for, why 'copy-x86' doesn't work for arm64, and what we plan to do instead. Draft slides are attached.
Sure, makes sense. Would you like to add a brief flow of the initialization?
The boot flow? Makes sense..
Correct. A picture/sequence-diagram is worth thousand words. :)
Thanks Salil
Hi Lorenzo,all,
在 2023年6月6日,上午4:11,Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org 写道:
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 19:16, Salil Mehta salil.mehta@huawei.com wrote:
From: James Morse james.morse@arm.com Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 6:07 PM
Hi Salil,
On 05/06/2023 18:00, Salil Mehta wrote:
From: James Morse james.morse@arm.com Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 5:27 PM On 01/06/2023 14:58, Salil Mehta wrote:
> -----Original Message----- > From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org > Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM > On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
> I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up > we should wait for them to confirm.
This week is an internal conference, so free time will be tricky. I'm free 10am until noon on Tuesday to Thursday UK time... (If you put anything at 10am, I need to have seen it the day before)
Possible to do it tomorrow between 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM BST (will keep it concise?)
Sure. Lorenzo would you be able to host it? (I'm not sure how the whole recording stuff works)
Thanks
I don't know if Joyce has time to set the call up, it is a bit too tight IMO.
Maybe Wednesday is better but I will let her comment on this.
OK, I can set up the meeting on Wednesday 11:00AM ~ 12:00PM BST time. But I may have some personal things conflict, but the ZOOM meeting can be automatically recorded. It will be much help if anybody can help summarize the meeting minuets.
Thanks, Lorenzo
I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day next week. The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should highlight as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk concise and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes which also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
I figured you want the majority of time for the qemu stuff and discussion.
It looks like Paolo has put us in the second last talk of the 2nd day so I suspect there is a scope to slip (I think) but thanks for your consideration.
I am also planning to keep the slides to the point.
I've got 5 minutes worth of material to describe what this is for, why 'copy-x86' doesn't work for arm64, and what we plan to do instead. Draft slides are attached.
Sure, makes sense. Would you like to add a brief flow of the initialization?
The boot flow? Makes sense..
Correct. A picture/sequence-diagram is worth thousand words. :)
Thanks Salil
Thanks:) Joyce
Hi all,
I have booked the meeting as below:
Linaro Open Disscussion meeting to Sync-up on vCPU hotplug Wednesday, 7 June⋅11:00 – 12:00 BST time Take meeting notes <> Start a new document to capture notes
More meeting notes options Location: https://linaro-org.zoom.us/j/92261646989 https://linaro-org.zoom.us/j/92261646989
@Lorenzo,James,
For the memory and RAS patch topics discussion, when do you suggest to have next time?
Thanks Joyce
在 2023年6月6日,上午6:25,Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org 写道:
Hi Lorenzo,all,
在 2023年6月6日,上午4:11,Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org 写道:
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 19:16, Salil Mehta salil.mehta@huawei.com wrote:
From: James Morse james.morse@arm.com Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 6:07 PM
Hi Salil,
On 05/06/2023 18:00, Salil Mehta wrote:
From: James Morse james.morse@arm.com Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 5:27 PM On 01/06/2023 14:58, Salil Mehta wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org >> Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:44 PM >> On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 16:26, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
>> I am available next week but if it is James and Salil who need to sync-up >> we should wait for them to confirm.
This week is an internal conference, so free time will be tricky. I'm free 10am until noon on Tuesday to Thursday UK time... (If you put anything at 10am, I need to have seen it the day before)
Possible to do it tomorrow between 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM BST (will keep it concise?)
Sure. Lorenzo would you be able to host it? (I'm not sure how the whole recording stuff works)
Thanks
I don't know if Joyce has time to set the call up, it is a bit too tight IMO.
Maybe Wednesday is better but I will let her comment on this.
OK, I can set up the meeting on Wednesday 11:00AM ~ 12:00PM BST time. But I may have some personal things conflict, but the ZOOM meeting can be automatically recorded. It will be much help if anybody can help summarize the meeting minuets.
Thanks, Lorenzo
> I am okay for the sync-up on Tuesday and flexible to adjust to any day next week. > The whole idea about the meeting was to discuss the points we should highlight > as part of the kernel and Qemu talk. This would help in keeping the talk concise > and relevant. The time allocated for both kernel and Qemu is 30 minutes which > also includes the Q&A. Hence, need to manage the time well there.
I figured you want the majority of time for the qemu stuff and discussion.
It looks like Paolo has put us in the second last talk of the 2nd day so I suspect there is a scope to slip (I think) but thanks for your consideration.
I am also planning to keep the slides to the point.
I've got 5 minutes worth of material to describe what this is for, why 'copy-x86' doesn't work for arm64, and what we plan to do instead. Draft slides are attached.
Sure, makes sense. Would you like to add a brief flow of the initialization?
The boot flow? Makes sense..
Correct. A picture/sequence-diagram is worth thousand words. :)
Thanks Salil
Thanks:) Joyce
linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org