17 Feb
2021
17 Feb
'21
6:34 a.m.
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 08:31:57PM +0800, Jammy Zhou wrote:
I'm okay, too. If no objection, I can reschedule the 22nd call to 2pm(GMT)/10pm (GMT+8)? or one extra hour later?
Hi,
I noticed the call on Monday is still scheduled at 10GMT, is that final ?
I'd need to know since I am asking other Arm folks to join, please let me know.
I think it is useful to send out a separate email with the calls details before the end of the week.
Thank you very much.
Lorenzo
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 at 19:55, Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:04:12AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 15:53:55 +0000 > Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:53:08AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 09:11:59 +0800 > > > Jammy Zhou <jammy.zhou@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 02:00, Lorenzo Pieralisi < lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:51:07AM +0800, Jammy Zhou wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 21:55, Lorenzo Pieralisi < > > > > > lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:30:33AM +0000, Jammy Zhou via > > > > > > Linaro-open-discussions wrote: > > > > > > > I have added these two topics to the agenda for meeting on Feb > > > > > 22nd. > > > > > > > > > > > > We should probably move it to an afternoon slot GMT otherwise I don't > > > > > > think anyone in the US can attend (I know that an afternoon slot GMT > > > > > > is problematic for people in Asia, don't know how to solve this, > > > > > > please let me know). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we need to cover EU, US and Asia, I think the evening time for Asia > > > > > is the > > > > > > only option, like 2pm(GMT)/10pm(GMT+8)/6am(GMT-8). > > > > > > > > > > > > Or maybe we need to have two slots, one is Asia friendly and the other > > > > > is US > > > > > > friendly. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any preference? > > > > > > > > > > I am UK based so the slot above is perfectly fine but others may > > > > > disagree. We can have two separate calls, one for virt CPU hotplug > > > > > and one for CXL, not sure though we have two completely disjoint > > > > > sets of attendees. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, it is difficult. Why not list the required key attendees first for > > > > each topic? Then we can select a proper time according to their time zones. > > > > > > Whilst others will of course be interested, from Huawei side I can cover CXL > > > - worth noting that I expect we are basically talking CXL 2.0 here not > > > earlier. The stuff currently going on is focused on spec verification and > > > preenablement for 2.0 (not a whole lot of hardware available yet - if there were > > > we wouldn't be actively scrubbing the spec whilst implementing it) > > > > > > 1.1 and earlier more or less just look like normal devices or memory + > > > some horrible impdef stuff in firmware. Might be room for some collaboration > > > in EDK2 - unclear though. There will be device specific stuff, but a lot > > > of that is impdef (how to do bias switching etc). > > > > > > I'm guessing I'll do the intro slides for this one unless someone > > > else wants to do the summary of current status / open questions bit? - more > > > than happy to collaborate on it as well! > > > > > > So for CXL > > > Me + Huawei UK team members(GMT) > > > If we got firmware heavy - perhaps not on first call on this topic - > > > Henson (GMT + 8) > > > Others from Huawei in China probably interested, though if time isn't great > > > probably not 'that interested' at this stage. > > > > > > From other members we clearly have > > > Lorenzo + ARM team (GMT + others?) > > > Jon Masters (GMT - 5 I think) > > > > > > Whilst I don't mind anyone from other interested companies (e.g. Intel) > > > showing up, I suspect that would make limited sense at a first discussion > > > of this topic? > > > > > > CPU HP like to be more interesting to my China based colleagues alongside > > > the UK team. So if we do go with a late slot for China rather than split > > > meeting, let's do that topic first. > > > > > > As to whether we want to split the meeting, that depends on whether we expect > > > a detailed discussion on this occasion, or more of an update on direction > > > followed by watch this space. Lorenzo any idea yet on which category we > > > might be in? > > > > I hope and work towards a virt CPU hotplug session that provides a > > finalized way forward (that is, what to do to upstream it rather than > > discussing how CPU hotplug should be implemented), which means I expect > > it to be fairly short - that's why I thought that CXL can be part of > > the same slot. > > Perhaps we could do them as a unified call (late time slot for China) > on the basis that we can have a follow up call on vCPU HP if > it appears necessary (after people have had time to digest what you share etc). > > Would that work for everyone? It does for me, thanks a lot. Lorenzo