Hi Joyce,
I'm checking the availability of people for the MPAM topic.
In the meantime one other topic might be good to discuss briefly.
Flush by PA range - need for a mini subsystem...
This is needed for CXL and we've jumped through various possible ways to handle it. 1) PSCI call (not currently in spec) Doesn't work well as 'only' solution as some hardware provides direct memory mapped IO interfaces for this.
2) ACPI wrapping of both PSCI call and memory mapped. Unfortunately you can wrap SCMI (via a PCC channel) but not (as I understand it SMCCC) so I don't think an ACPI wrapper in general works.
3) Current option: Face up to the fact we need to just do this kernel first with drivers for the various hardware that surfaces. We aren't particularly far into a design yet so maybe email is fine for now if people are busy.
For this I'm thinking a really small subsystem / class. Lots of design options but one might be 1) Driver registers with class and provides PA ranges for which it needs to be notified (simpler option is it gets notified of everything) Class is there for userspace to be able to see what is involved... 2) Notification chain follows similar design to mmu notifiers, just on physical addresses and global rather than tied to each mm.
Requirements for design: 1) Multiple entities may need to be told to flush for a given range (interleaving etc may be going on). 2) Flush should be range. Any hardware that doesn't support range will need to flush everything. 3) Support rich set of flushes. Drivers may have to upgrade the lighter ones to what they support (cache coherency protocols all allow this so should be technically fine to do rather than reject the flush) Other things I've forgotten?
In particular I'd like any insights people have on plausible hardware designs that this approach might not work for.
A sticky corner is how to know that all drivers for architecturally necessary flushes are present. Easy to check if there is one covering the range, not so easy to check if one instance of an interleaves solution is missing. We can probably solve this at the individual driver level, but it's ugly.
Jonathan
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:53:50 +0800 Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Jonathan，
Would you like to discuss the MPAM topics during this Tuesday(tomorrow) LOD meeting?
Thanks Joyce
On 24 Sep 2024, at 21:15, Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Jonathan，
On 24 Sep 2024, at 19:49, Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com mailto:jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
Ah. Sorry, I'd lost track of the date and only got back from LPC today.
We will want to organize an MPAM discussion shortly - I'll get in touch once I know the material is ready etc and perhaps it makes sense prior to next scheduled meeting.
Welcome，we can reschedule when you are ready！
Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org Sent: 23 September 2024 02:45 To: Jonathan Cameron jonathan.cameron@huawei.com Cc: James Morse via Linaro-open-discussions linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org; Salil Mehta salil.mehta@huawei.com; Shiju Jose shiju.jose@huawei.com Subject: Re: Linaro-open-discussions Digest, Vol 38, Issue 14
Hi Jonathan，
Do you need to sync something tomorrow during the LOD meeting this time？
Thanks Joyce
On 27 Aug 2024, at 16:51, Jonathan Cameron jonathan.cameron@huawei.com wrote:
Hi Joyce,
Sorry for lack of reply. Was a holiday in UK yesterday.
There are a couple of topics brewing, bug we obviously didn't give enough notice to talk about them today.
We may want to try to reschedule. I'll let you know if not.
Jonathan
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 07:52:29 +0800 Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Jonathan，all，
Not sure if you have anything（RAS or others） need to sync this Tuesday？
Thanks Joyce
On 22 Jul 2024, at 23:22, Jonathan Cameron jonathan.cameron@huawei.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 17:48:26 +0800 Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote: > Hi Jonathan，all， > > Do we need a call next Tuesday to talk about the below RAS series > topics？ > Hi Joyce,
The RAS series is continuing but nothing urgent to pick up this week and most of the relevant people have clashes tomorrow.
On the NUMA handling, Mike has posted patches which look pretty good to me so that one may well be resolved.
So from our side I don't think there is anything urgent to discuss.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> Thanks > Joyce > > >> On 21 Jun 2024, at 16:30, Jonathan Cameron jonathan.cameron@huawei.com wrote: >> >> Hi Joyce, >> >> Unfortunately I have a clash on Tuesday and I think James is >> currently on leave (via an autoresponder message). >> >> Let me check if we have urgent issues - perhaps we can schedule a >> call at a different time. >> >> We are working with Mauro Carvalho Chehab who recently rejoined >> Huawei and is a long time RAS expert + kernel maintainer to try >> and unblock the RAS series mentioned below. >> >> For vCPU HP the kernel patches still haven't been picked up, but I >> can poke the relevant maintainers via email. It needs to go >> through the ARM64 main kernel tree I think and Will and Catalin >> have not yet replied. >> >> The NUMA CXL memory topic hit an not particularly amusing issue. >> Mike Rapoport has decided it's time to finally unify the x86 >> handling with everyone else's. He's doing the work which is good, >> but on the downside it stalls ARM support for now and the >> unification is proving tricky it seems. >> >> Jonathan >> >> >> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:22:40 +0800 Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Jonathan，all， >>> >>> Would like to sync next Tuesday for some topics（CXL memory or >>> others）？ >>> >>> Thanks >>> Joyce >>> >>> >>>> On 28 May 2024, at 16:45, Jonathan Cameron jonathan.cameron@huawei.com wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Joyce, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the reminder. Yesterday was a holiday in the UK so I only just picked this up. >>>> >>>> A few status reports probably make sense but no need for a call. >>>> >>>> 1) vCPU HP kernel - will rebase in next day or two and send >>>> out. The tags for ACPI and (most of) GIC changes came in just >>>> too late for last cyc.e If James can take a look great if not really only needs Will or Catalin to look at it from an arch point of view. QEMU in progress - arch agnostic bit has a lot of good review and adoption by other arch. >>>> Arch specific version being rebased etc. >>>> >>>> 2) >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240321-b4-arm-ras-error-vendor-inf >>>> o-v5-rc3-v5-0-850f9bfb97a8@os.amperecomputing.com/ >>>> The series: [PATCH v5 0/2] Adds additional information to ARM >>>> RAS errors is still in need of review and is blocking a key >>>> feature for us (CPU isolation in rasadaemon) >>>> >>>> I think we need to make better use of this meeting. I'll try and line up some useful topics for next month. >>>> One possible is some numa fixes for CXL memory etc that I'll post an RFC for in the next few days. >>>> >>>> Jonathan >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org >>>> Sent: 26 May 2024 14:39 >>>> To: Jonathan Cameron jonathan.cameron@huawei.com >>>> Cc: James Morse via Linaro-open-discussions >>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org; Salil Mehta >>>> salil.mehta@huawei.com; Shiju Jose shiju.jose@huawei.com >>>> Subject: Re: Linaro-open-discussions Digest, Vol 38, Issue 14 >>>> >>>> Hi Jonathan，all， >>>> >>>> Any topics need to sync next Tuesday？ >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Joyce >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 22 Apr 2024, at 19:07, Jonathan Cameron jonathan.cameron@huawei.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 18:39:54 +0800 Joyce Qi >>>>> joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Jonathan，all， >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have any topic to sync tomorrow >>>>> >>>>> Hi Joyce, >>>>> >>>>> Two things from me but maybe email is sufficient if we have >>>>> nothing else on the agenda: >>>>> >>>>> 1) [PATCH v5 0/2] Adds additional information to ARM RAS errors >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240321-b4-arm-ras-error-vendor-in >>>>> fo-v5-r c3-v5-0-850f9bfb97a8@os.amperecomputing.com/#t >>>>> >>>>> Originally one of our patch sets (Ampere currently pushing it), >>>>> but has been stalled a long time. There is a need for input >>>>> from Tony Luck at Intel but also probably needs some ARM review to push it forwards. >>>>> >>>>> 2) From Salil and I, a general update on vCPU HP seems in order. >>>>> >>>>> For kernel side of things, Russell got the _STA change in last >>>>> cycle, but then Rafael (ACPI maintainer) backed it out again to >>>>> replace it with a more general solution (avoiding an esoteric >>>>> bug) That released things a little and got us past one of the more fundamental aspects. >>>>> >>>>> We have been going in circles somewhat since then and ended up >>>>> with a solution that looks much more like some early proposals but 'hopefully' >>>>> having been through the process it will be acceptable. >>>>> >>>>> Rafael has confirmed the basic form of the ACPI patches now >>>>> seems fine to him but will review in detail over next week or >>>>> so. Obviously we are tight to the end of the cycle, so this may not quite make it. >>>>> If it doesn't, should be in a good shape for early in 6.11. >>>>> >>>>> I think there are some missing acks for some of the smaller >>>>> patches + we need agreement from arm64 arch maintainers to the >>>>> new >>>>> arch_register_cpu() call. We'd been so focused on major parts >>>>> of series minor changes to the gicv3 driver etc haven't picked up the tags they should have. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks due to Rafael for quick feedback over last few weeks and >>>>> Russell, Miguel, James, Jean-Phillipe, various Huawei folk over >>>>> time and others who have been involved in this epic saga. Not >>>>> there yet but maybe the finish line is in sight. >>>>> >>>>> Which will unlock the QEMU side of things. >>>>> >>>>> Jonathan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Joyce >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> 在 2024年3月25日，22:27，Jonathan Cameron >>>>>>> Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com >>>>>>> 写道： >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think it makes sense at this point. May well make more sense to discuss in a few weeks though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not aware of anything else that makes sense to discuss, so probably cancel the meeting this time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org >>>>>>> Sent: 22 March 2024 14:18 >>>>>>> To: Jonathan Cameron jonathan.cameron@huawei.com >>>>>>> Cc: James Morse via Linaro-open-discussions >>>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org; Salil Mehta >>>>>>> salil.mehta@huawei.com >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Linaro-open-discussions Digest, Vol 38, Issue 14 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jonathan, all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do we want to sync CPU HP or other topics next Tuesday? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> Joyce >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 在 2024年2月23日，19:59，Jonathan Cameron >>>>>>>> Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com >>>>>>>> 写道： >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:00:22 +0800 Joyce Qi >>>>>>>> joyce.qi@linaro.org wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Jonathan，all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do we have something to sync next Tuesday? >>>>>>>> Hi Joyce >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Currently nothing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There has been some activity on CPU HP. >>>>>>>> Rafael has proposed alternative approach for _STA handling. >>>>>>>> Seems fine to me (+ I've tested it) but more eyes always good! >>>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/4562925.LvFx2qVVIh@kreach >>>>>>>> er/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hopefully we can get the testing needed (related to device >>>>>>>> surprise removal as those paths are touched) and slip this >>>>>>>> in for next merge window. We want this in ASAP so we find >>>>>>>> out about any broken firmware in the wild. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not a useful meeting topic though! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There are a few things we are working on that will want >>>>>>>> discussion but we aren't ready for next week (and need to >>>>>>>> give warning to get the right other people there!) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> Joyce >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 在 2024年1月17日，15:44，Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org 写道： >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jonathan，all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Happy New Year to all! >>>>>>>>>> Do we have any topic to sync next week? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> BR >>>>>>>>>> Joyce >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 在 2023年12月20日，19:42，Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org 写道： >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jonathan，all >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any topic to sync next Tuesday？ >>>>>>>>>>> Since it is Christmas next week，we can put off the meeting after the holiday whenever you want to sync. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>> Joyce >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 在 >>>>>>>>>>>> 2023年11月29日，08:00，linaro-open-discussions-request@op-lists.linaro. >>>>>>>>>>>> org 写道： >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Send Linaro-open-discussions mailing list submissions to >>>>>>>>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message >>>>>>>>>>>> with subject or body 'help' to >>>>>>>>>>>> linaro-open-discussions-request@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>>>>>>>>>> linaro-open-discussions-owner@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is >>>>>>>>>>>> more specific than "Re: Contents of Linaro-open-discussions digest..." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Today's Topics: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Re: [Request] Regarding non-RFC patch-set of Virtual >>>>>>>>>>>> CPU Hotplug kernel support (Joyce Qi) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> ------- >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Message: 1 >>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 08:44:14 +0800 >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Joyce Qi joyce.qi@linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [Linaro-open-discussions] Re: [Request] Regarding non-RFC >>>>>>>>>>>> patch-set of Virtual CPU Hotplug kernel support >>>>>>>>>>>> To: Salil Mehta salil.mehta@huawei.com >>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Jianyong Wu Jianyong.Wu@arm.com, Russell King >>>>>>>>>>>> linux@armlinux.org.uk, James Morse James.Morse@arm.com, >>>>>>>>>>>> "linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org" >>>>>>>>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi >>>>>>>>>>>> lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org, "karl.heubaum@oracle.com" >>>>>>>>>>>> karl.heubaum@oracle.com, "darren@os.amperecomputing.com" >>>>>>>>>>>> darren@os.amperecomputing.com, "ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com" >>>>>>>>>>>> ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com, "miguel.luis@oracle.com" >>>>>>>>>>>> miguel.luis@oracle.com, "vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com" >>>>>>>>>>>> vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com, Linuxarm linuxarm@huawei.com, >>>>>>>>>>>> "salil.mehta@opnsrc.net" salil.mehta@opnsrc.net >>>>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: 764691EE-1EA6-4245-8D92-434B0CD3BBC4@linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all， >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Will cancel today’s meeting since the “Regarding non-RFC patch-set of Virtual CPU Hotplug kernel support” can be continually discussed in the LOD mail list. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks:) >>>>>>>>>>>> Joyce >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 在 2023年11月27日，17:50，Salil Mehta >>>>>>>>>>>>> salil.mehta@huawei.com 写道： >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Joyce, >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have do not have any. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>> Salil >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Joyce Qi <joyce.qi@linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:joyce.qi@linaro.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2023 11:51 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@arm.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:Jianyong.Wu@arm.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:linux@armlinux.org.uk>; James Morse >>>>>>>>>>>>> <James.Morse@arm.com mailto:James.Morse@arm.com>; >>>>>>>>>>>>> Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:salil.mehta@huawei.com>; >>>>>>>>>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org; >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org>; >>>>>>>>>>>>> karl.heubaum@oracle.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:karl.heubaum@oracle.com; >>>>>>>>>>>>> darren@os.amperecomputing.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:darren@os.amperecomputing.com; >>>>>>>>>>>>> ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com; >>>>>>>>>>>>> miguel.luis@oracle.com mailto:miguel.luis@oracle.com; >>>>>>>>>>>>> vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com; Linuxarm >>>>>>>>>>>>> <linuxarm@huawei.com mailto:linuxarm@huawei.com>; >>>>>>>>>>>>> salil.mehta@opnsrc.net mailto:salil.mehta@opnsrc.net; >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Linaro-open-discussions] Re: [Request] >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding non-RFC patch-set of Virtual CPU Hotplug >>>>>>>>>>>>> kernel support >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all， >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have topic to sync next Tuesday？ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joyce >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 在 2023年11月22日，09:22，Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@arm.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:Jianyong.Wu@arm.com> 写道： >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:linux@armlinux.org.uk> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 2023年11月21日 17:45 >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@arm.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:Jianyong.Wu@arm.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: James Morse <James.Morse@arm.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:James.Morse@arm.com>; salil.mehta@huawei.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:salil.mehta@huawei.com; >>>>>>>>>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org; >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joyce Qi <joyce.qi@linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:joyce.qi@linaro.org>; Lorenzo Pieralisi >>>>>>>>>>>>> <lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:lorenzo.pieralisi@linaro.org>; >>>>>>>>>>>>> karl.heubaum@oracle.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:karl.heubaum@oracle.com; >>>>>>>>>>>>> darren@os.amperecomputing.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:darren@os.amperecomputing.com; >>>>>>>>>>>>> ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com; >>>>>>>>>>>>> miguel.luis@oracle.com mailto:miguel.luis@oracle.com; >>>>>>>>>>>>> vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com; Linuxarm >>>>>>>>>>>>> <linuxarm@huawei.com mailto:linuxarm@huawei.com>; >>>>>>>>>>>>> salil.mehta@opnsrc.net mailto:salil.mehta@opnsrc.net >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Linaro-open-discussions] Re: [Request] >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding non-RFC patch-set of Virtual CPU Hotplug >>>>>>>>>>>>> kernel support >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 09:41:36AM +0000, Jianyong Wu wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, I have a plan to add an integration test CI in >>>>>>>>>>>>> kata community for Vcpu Hotplug on Arm. There we can do >>>>>>>>>>>>> more tests integrating with k8s. To do the test, I need >>>>>>>>>>>>> a stable git link of Kernel and Qemu including the >>>>>>>>>>>>> latest change, thus, I can clone the code from a fixed source in each test. It's very helpful if you guys could aid. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think I properly replied to this. I think what >>>>>>>>>>>>> you want is not a "stable" git tree, but a branch that you can pull that always contains the latest code. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For my tree, that will be: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm.git >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm.git >>>>>>>>>>>>> aarch64/hotplug-vcpu/head >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> which will be regularly kept updated and rebased >>>>>>>>>>>>> against the mainline kernel. It may sometimes be between releases rather than based on -rc or final kernels. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Great! That's what I want. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Does that satisfy your need? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Thanks Russell. It saves me lots of work. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jianyong >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> RMK's Patch system: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last! >>>>>>>>>>>>> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Digest Footer >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Linaro-open-discussions mailing list -- >>>>>>>>>>>> linaro-open-discussions@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>>>>>>>>>>> linaro-open-discussions-leave@op-lists.linaro.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> End of Linaro-open-discussions Digest, Vol 38, Issue 14 >>>>>>>>>>>> ******************************************************* >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Thanks Joyce