Re: [Linaro-open-discussions] ACPI based Virtual CPU Hotplug (possible specification) Follow-up - Suggested Agenda / timings for Monday 7 Dec call

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 09:11:59AM +0800, Jammy Zhou wrote:

On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 02:00, Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com wrote:

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:51:07AM +0800, Jammy Zhou wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 21:55, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com
>
> wrote:
>
>     On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:30:33AM +0000, Jammy Zhou via
>     Linaro-open-discussions wrote:
>     > I have added these two topics to the agenda for meeting on Feb
22nd.
>
>     We should probably move it to an afternoon slot GMT otherwise I don't
>     think anyone in the US can attend (I know that an afternoon slot GMT
>     is problematic for people in Asia, don't know how to solve this,
>     please let me know).
>
>
> If we need to cover EU, US and Asia, I think the evening time for Asia is
the
> only option, like 2pm(GMT)/10pm(GMT+8)/6am(GMT-8).
>
> Or maybe we need to have two slots, one is Asia friendly and the other is
US
> friendly.
>
> Any preference?

I am UK based so the slot above is perfectly fine but others may
disagree. We can have two separate calls, one for virt CPU hotplug
and one for CXL, not sure though we have two completely disjoint
sets of attendees.

Hmm, it is difficult. Why not list the required key attendees first for each topic? Then we can select a proper time according to their time zones.

I think that we can keep the call on Feb 22nd scheduled as-is and have virt CPU hotplug *only* in the agenda (and maybe some back-up topics in case there is some time left).

I don't know if attendees in the US are interested in the virt CPU hotplug discussions though.

For CXL, JonathanC, JonM and I expressed interest maybe we can schedule a specific discussion CXL based in a slot that is more suitable for the US timezone on a separate date.

Lorenzo