On 11/13/23 12:24, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
Just thought it's time to share the current state of drm purecap work:
Kernel: https://git.morello-project.org/carhai01/linux-drm-purecap/-/commit/7ea169ab...
And a less ifdeffy version:
https://git.morello-project.org/carhai01/linux-drm-purecap/-/commit/753565cb...
DRM: https://git.morello-project.org/carhai01/drm-linux-morello-purecap/-/commit/...
All the DRM tests ow pass for compat and purecap.
I'm of 2 minds in the kernel code. I could go mimic the "copy field" stuff from EBPF but it's still going to be a bit messy. DRM code calls everything "compat" "32" so I'm keeping with that naming scheme (compat for us is 64bit). I've kept the compat structs at the entry points. I could copy to a local "native" struct I guess... It'd mean I carry more local data than I actually need/use.
Anyway... comments? _______________________________________________ linux-morello mailing list -- linux-morello@op-lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-morello-leave@op-lists.linaro.org