On 02/11/2022 12:08, Tudor Cretu wrote:
Don't exclude PTE_READ_CAPS and PTE_WRITE_CAPS when calling pte_modify.
I would be good to explain why, as this is just saying what the diff is. In fact, I am not entirely sure I understand why we need this now (and we didn't need it before).
Kevin
Signed-off-by: Tudor Cretu tudor.cretu@arm.com
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h index dff2b483ea50..642f561e55a9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ static inline pte_t pte_modify(pte_t pte, pgprot_t newprot) */ const pteval_t mask = PTE_USER | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_RDONLY | PTE_PROT_NONE | PTE_VALID | PTE_WRITE | PTE_GP |
PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK;
PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK | PTE_LOAD_CAPS | PTE_STORE_CAPS;