Hi Tudor,
Overall the change looks good though it seems the other io_cancel test might suffer from the same issue (?). Might be worth to make those two aligned, event though the other one will not be triggered.
--- BR B. On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 12:12:30PM +0100, Tudor Cretu wrote:
The kernel might check for a valid context before checking the access of the pointers. In such a case, it will return EINVAL instead of EFAULT. Add an io_setup step to the test to ensure the io_cancel syscall fails because of the intended cause.
Signed-off-by: Tudor Cretu tudor.cretu@arm.com
This patch doesn't have any dependency, but it's a dependency to the following Morello Linux series: "Support aio shared memory usage in the Purecap apps"
Review branch: https://git.morello-project.org/tudcre01/morello-linux-ltp/-/commits/morello...
.../kernel/syscalls/io_cancel/io_cancel01.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_cancel/io_cancel01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_cancel/io_cancel01.c index f7e8bd061ed7..f31ed07fac93 100644 --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_cancel/io_cancel01.c +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_cancel/io_cancel01.c @@ -18,11 +18,22 @@ #include "tst_test.h" #include "lapi/syscalls.h" -static void run(void) +static aio_context_t ctx;
+static void setup(void) {
- aio_context_t ctx;
- TST_EXP_PASS_SILENT(tst_syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx));
+}
- memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx));
+static void cleanup(void) +{
- if (ctx)
TST_EXP_PASS_SILENT(tst_syscall(__NR_io_destroy, ctx));
+}
+static void run(void) +{ TST_EXP_FAIL(tst_syscall(__NR_io_cancel, ctx, NULL, NULL), EFAULT); } @@ -31,5 +42,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = { "CONFIG_AIO=y", NULL },
- .setup = setup,
- .cleanup = cleanup, .test_all = run,
};
2.34.1
linux-morello-ltp mailing list -- linux-morello-ltp@op-lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-morello-ltp-leave@op-lists.linaro.org