Le jeu. 6 août 2020 à 20:47, Dan Rue via Lkq-dev < lkq-dev@op-lists.linaro.org> a écrit :

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:07:54AM +0000, Milosz Wasilewski via Lkq-dev wrote:

...

Hi,

RPi4 dispatchers seem to work well in case of LITE devices. I think they might solve some of the problems we have with the current 'big dispatcher' model in LKFT. This however comes with a potential threat. RPi are usine ARM64 architecture which is not officially supported by Android tools (adb, fastboot). They do work so I might just be overreacting, but I would like to know your opinion. What should we do in the LAB a) yes, please try using RPi4 as a dispatcher for Beagle X15 b) it's a silly idea and a waste of time. Results from such tests can never be trusted.

(a) - it seems like the approach is viable! My only concerns are ensuring that we have multiarch containers for docker, which are still seemingly a pain to build under automation.

lava-dispatcher and lava-server on docker hub are multiarch containers.